Literature DB >> 19696273

Musculoskeletal ultrasound: focused impact on MRI.

Jon A Jacobson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article will compare and contrast image interpretation, accuracy, observer variability, economic impact, and education with regard to musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI because these factors will influence the growth of musculoskeletal ultrasound and the impact on MRI.
CONCLUSION: The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound continues to grow and there are a number of factors that impact MRI. The development of less expensive portable ultrasound machines has opened the market to nonradiologists, and applications for musculoskeletal ultrasound have broadened. Selective substitution of musculoskeletal ultrasound for MRI can result in significant cost saving to the health care system. Although this change could decrease the use of MRI, issues related to accuracy, variability, education, and competence must be addressed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19696273     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  24 in total

1.  The utility of ultrasound for diagnosing purulent infections of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Andrea Halim; Yushane Shih; Seth D Dodds
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-06-11

Review 2.  Shear-Wave Elastography: Basic Physics and Musculoskeletal Applications.

Authors:  Mihra S Taljanovic; Lana H Gimber; Giles W Becker; L Daniel Latt; Andrea S Klauser; David M Melville; Liang Gao; Russell S Witte
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Current and Prospective Use of Musculoskeletal Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging at Chiropractic Teaching Institutions: A Worldwide Survey of Diagnostic Imaging Staff.

Authors:  Rogan E A Henderson; Bruce F Walker; Kenneth J Young
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-11-22

4.  Electrical stimulation and blood flow restriction increase wrist extensor cross-sectional area and flow meditated dilatation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Mark K Timmons; David R Dolbow; Justin Bengel; Kendall C Fugate-Laus; Lori A Michener; David R Gater
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Advanced Hemophilic Arthropathy: Sensitivity of Soft Tissue Discrimination With Musculoskeletal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Annette von Drygalski; Randy E Moore; Sonha Nguyen; Richard F W Barnes; Lena M Volland; Tudor H Hughes; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Image acquisition stability of fixated musculoskeletal sonography in an exercise setting: a quantitative analysis and comparison with freehand acquisition.

Authors:  H Maarten Heres; Marloes Sjoerdsma; Thijs Schoots; Marcel C M Rutten; Frans N van de Vosse; Richard G P Lopata
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Cross-sectional area of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle: comparison of MRI and ultrasound measures.

Authors:  Phoebe R Macrae; Richard D Jones; Daniel J Myall; Tracy R Melzer; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  The comparison of the empty can and full can techniques and a new diagonal horizontal adduction test for supraspinatus muscle testing using cross-sectional analysis through ultrasonography.

Authors:  Steven W Forbush; Douglas M White; Wayne Smith
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-06

Review 9.  Advances and challenges in hemophilic arthropathy.

Authors:  Tine Wyseure; Laurent O Mosnier; Annette von Drygalski
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 10.  The accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound imaging for musculoskeletal soft tissue pathology of the extremities: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Rogan E A Henderson; Bruce F Walker; Kenneth J Young
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.