Literature DB >> 19694528

Outcomes of locally advanced (T3 or greater) prostate cancer in men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Jessica T Casey1, Joshua J Meeks, Kristin A Greco, Simon D Wu, Robert B Nadler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite nearly equivalent outcomes between open and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa), the role of primary treatment with RALP in men with locally advanced (T3 or greater) PCa has not been described in detail. We report our experience with RALP for pathologically advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2005 to November 2008, 220 RALPs were performed by a single surgeon (R.B.N.). Outcomes were assessed prospectively in an institutional review board-approved database.
RESULTS: Of 220 RALPs, 35 (15.9%) were performed for pT3 PCa; none of them were identified preoperatively. There was no difference in operative time compared with patients with pT2 disease (271 vs. 295 minutes, p = 0.09). The positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was 20% compared with 4.9% for pT2 (p = 0.004). Sural nerve grafts were performed in 20%, and 57% had bilateral nerve sparing. The use of bilateral or unilateral nerve sparing was not associated with increased PSM (p = 0.85). Biochemical recurrence occurred in 28.6% of men with pT3 disease over an average of 13 months of follow-up time, 30% of which occurred in men with a PSM. At 6 months, an 85% continence rate was achieved, and at 1 year continence was 100% for pT3. Compared with pT2, men with advanced disease had similar recovery after RALP based on postsurgery questionnaires.
CONCLUSIONS: RALP is a feasible approach to patients with pathologically advanced PCa as 71% were without evidence of disease at 13 months postoperatively. PSM rate (20%) is comparable to previously reported open PSM rates (24-66%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19694528     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

1.  Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Srinivas Samavedi; Anthony S Bates; Vladimir Mouraviev; Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-19

2.  Clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with nerve sparing vs. non-nerve sparing for high-risk prostate cancer cases.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Takahara; Makoto Sumitomo; Kosuke Fukaya; Takahito Jyoudai; Masashi Nishino; Masaru Hikichi; Kenji Zennami; Takuhisa Nukaya; Manabu Ichino; Naohiko Fukami; Hitomi Sasaki; Mamoru Kusaka; Ryoichi Shiroki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy plus extended lymph nodes dissection for cases with non-extra node metastatic prostate cancer: 5-year experience in a single Chinese institution.

Authors:  Ming-Kun Chen; Yun Luo; Hao Zhang; Jiang-Guang Qiu; Xin-Qiao Wen; Jun Pang; Jie Si-Tu; Qi-Peng Sun; Xin Gao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Trends in radical prostatectomy: centralization, robotics, and access to urologic cancer care.

Authors:  Karyn B Stitzenberg; Yu-Ning Wong; Matthew E Nielsen; Brian L Egleston; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Can we predict real T3 stage prostate cancer in patients with clinical T3 (cT3) disease before radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 6.  The very-high-risk prostate cancer: a contemporary update.

Authors:  R Mano; J Eastham; O Yossepowitch
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: technical considerations and review of the literature.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2011-09-25

Review 8.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives.

Authors:  Abdullah Erdem Canda; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index as a prognostic factor for radical prostatectomy outcomes of very high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Jae Won Park; Dong Hoon Koh; Won Sik Jang; Joo Yong Lee; Kang Su Cho; Won Sik Ham; Koon Ho Rha; Woo Hee Jung; Sung Joon Hong; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lamont J Wilkins; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Debasish Sundi; Ashley E Ross; Dominic Grimberg; Eric A Klein; Brian F Chapin; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.