Literature DB >> 19692204

Screening for psychological distress in palliative care: performance of touch screen questionnaires compared with semistructured psychiatric interview.

Parvez Thekkumpurath1, Chitra Venkateswaran, Manoj Kumar, Alex Newsham, Michael I Bennett.   

Abstract

This study examined the criterion validity of computer-based screening tools (Distress Thermometer [DT], Brief Symptom Inventory-18 [BSI-18], and General Health Questionnaire-12 [GHQ-12]) in detecting any form of psychological distress in palliative care patients, compared with a semistructured psychiatric interview, Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN). Patients aged 18 years or older referred to specialist palliative care services in Leeds completed the computer-based screening tools before SCAN interview by psychiatrists who were blind to screening results. SCAN interviews generated International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) psychiatric diagnoses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis compared the performance of screening tools with SCAN interview in identifying cases of distress. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Of the 226 eligible patients during the study period, 174 consented and 150 completed the study. Fifty-one (34%) patients satisfied ICD-10 criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis, adjustment disorder being the most common one (22%). On ROC analysis, DT, BSI-18, and GHQ-12 showed an AUC of 0.729, 0.729, and 0.755, respectively. At optimum cutoff values, sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 and 0.59 for DT, 0.78 and 0.62 for BSI-18, and 0.77 and 0.61 for GHQ-12, respectively. These data indicate that more than one-third of palliative care patients experience psychological distress. The three touch screen-based screening tools performed equally well in identifying distress compared with a psychiatric interview. The single-item DT is as good as longer screening tools, with an optimum cutoff of 5 in this population. Depressive disorders may be rarer in this population than commonly thought, in comparison to adjustment disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692204     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  14 in total

1.  The diagnostic role of a short screening tool--the distress thermometer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuelei Ma; Jing Zhang; Wuning Zhong; Chi Shu; Fengtian Wang; Jianing Wen; Min Zhou; Yaxiong Sang; Yu Jiang; Lei Liu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Expert opinion on detecting and treating depression in palliative care: A Delphi study.

Authors:  Lauren Rayner; Annabel Price; Matthew Hotopf; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 3.  Case identification of depression in patients with chronic physical health problems: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of 113 studies.

Authors:  Nicholas Meader; Alex J Mitchell; Carolyn Chew-Graham; David Goldberg; Maria Rizzo; Victoria Bird; David Kessler; Jon Packham; Mark Haddad; Stephen Pilling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Test-retest of computerized health status questionnaires frequently used in the monitoring of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Henrik Gudbergsen; Else M Bartels; Peter Krusager; Eva E Wæhrens; Robin Christensen; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Screening for major depressive disorder in adults with cerebral glioma: an initial validation of 3 self-report instruments.

Authors:  Alasdair G Rooney; Shanne McNamara; Mairi Mackinnon; Mary Fraser; Roy Rampling; Alan Carson; Robin Grant
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Evaluation of Distress and Stress in Cancer Patients in AMIR Oncology Hospital in Shiraz.

Authors:  A Mansourabadi; M Moogooei; S Nozari
Journal:  Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

7.  Computerized neuropsychological assessment in aging: testing efficacy and clinical ecology of different interfaces.

Authors:  Matteo Canini; Petronilla Battista; Pasquale Anthony Della Rosa; Eleonora Catricalà; Christian Salvatore; Maria Carla Gilardi; Isabella Castiglioni
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 8.  Toward patient-centered care: a systematic review of how to ask questions that matter to patients.

Authors:  Alicia Rosenzveig; Ayse Kuspinar; Stella S Daskalopoulou; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Assessment of Anxiety and Depression in Oral Mucositis Patients Undergoing Cancer Chemoradiotherapy: A Randomized Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Nallan Csk Chaitanya; Komali Garlapati; Danam Reshma Priyanka; Sravani Soma; Ujwala Suskandla; Niharika Harsha Boinepally
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

10.  Assessing the validity of the clinician-rated distress thermometer in palliative care.

Authors:  A Van Lander; A Tarot; C Savanovitch; B Pereira; B Vennat; V Guastella
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.