Literature DB >> 19688616

The implementation and evaluation of a mandatory multi-professional obstetric skills training program.

Jette Led Sørensen1, Ellen Løkkegaard, Marianne Johansen, Charlotte Ringsted, Svend Kreiner, Sean McAleer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE. To implement and evaluate a simulation-based training program. DESIGN. Descriptive. STUDY PERIOD: June 2003-June 2006. SETTING. Obstetric Department, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. POPULATION. Two training sessions were provided for all health professionals including doctors, midwives, auxiliary nurses, and 147 out 156 participants (94%) took part in the first training session and 192 out possible 201 (96%) took part in the second session. METHODS. An intervention study of the impact of simulation-based training in management of postpartum bleeding, shoulder dystocia, basic neonatal resuscitation, and severe preeclampsia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Before, just after and 9-15 months following the training, data were collected on the confidence and stress levels relating to the carrying out of certain procedures. In addition, a written objective test on basic neonatal resuscitation was administered. Data on any changes in work-routines experienced by the participants were obtained by open-ended questions. Registry data from the Danish Medical Birth Registry and from the hospital administration were included in the analysis. RESULTS. Ninety-two percent of all respondents had a positive attitude toward the training program. They considered management of shoulder dystocia, preeclampsia, and neonatal resuscitation less stresful and less unpleasant to perform after training. Confidence scores for all the trained skills improved significantly. A significant association was found between confidence in neonatal resuscitation and numbers of correct answers in the objective test. More than 90% found the training to have had a positive influence on their work. The need for organizational changes in the department became evident and necessary changes were implemented. Sick leave amongst midwives diminished significantly during the study period. CONCLUSIONS. A comprehensive evaluation of a mandatory simulation-based program, implemented in a obstetric department, demonstrated a positive impact at individual and organizational levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19688616     DOI: 10.1080/00016340903176834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  17 in total

1.  Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer.

Authors:  Mathilde Maagaard; Jette Led Sorensen; Jeanett Oestergaard; Torur Dalsgaard; Teodor P Grantcharov; Bent S Ottesen; Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Multi-professional training for obstetric emergencies in a U.S. hospital over a 7-year interval: an observational study.

Authors:  C P Weiner; L Collins; S Bentley; Y Dong; C L Satterwhite
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Retention of robot-assisted surgical skills in urological surgeons acquired using Mimic dV-Trainer.

Authors:  Jun Teishima; Minoru Hattori; Shogo Inoue; Kenichiro Ikeda; Keisuke Hieda; Shinya Ohara; Hiroyuki Egi; Hideki Ohdan; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Can inter-professional simulation training influence the frequency of blood transfusions after birth?

Authors:  Signe Egenberg; Pål Øian; Lars Edvin Bru; Michael Sautter; Gunn Kristoffersen; Torbjørn Moe Eggebø
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Design of simulation-based medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Bent Ottesen; Lars Konge; Peter Dieckmann; Cees Van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Cees Van der Vleuten; Jane Lindschou; Christian Gluud; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Marianne Johansen; Kim Ekelund; Charlotte Krebs Albrechtsen; Berit Woetman Pedersen; Hanne Kjærgaard; Pia Weikop; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Helping Mothers Survive Bleeding After Birth: retention of knowledge, skills, and confidence nine months after obstetric simulation-based training.

Authors:  Ellen Nelissen; Hege Ersdal; Estomih Mduma; Bjørg Evjen-Olsen; Jacqueline Broerse; Jos van Roosmalen; Jelle Stekelenburg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Optimization of competency in obstetrical emergencies: a role for simulation training.

Authors:  Cécile Monod; Cora A Voekt; Martina Gisin; Stefan Gisin; Irene M Hoesli
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Clarifying the learning experiences of healthcare professionals with in situ and off-site simulation-based medical education: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Laura Emdal Navne; Helle Max Martin; Bent Ottesen; Charlotte Krebs Albrecthsen; Berit Woetmann Pedersen; Hanne Kjærgaard; Cees van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Cees van der Vleuten; Susanne Rosthøj; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Marianne Johansen; Kim Ekelund; Liis Starkopf; Jane Lindschou; Christian Gluud; Pia Weikop; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.