Literature DB >> 19688586

Influence of different conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of novel light-curing nano-ionomer restorative to enamel and dentin.

Yonca Korkmaz1, Emre Ozel, Nuray Attar, Ceren Ozge Bicer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate shear bond strength (SBS) between a light-curing nano-ionomer restorative and enamel or dentin after acid etching, after erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser etching, or after combined treatment. Forty third molars were selected, the crowns were sectioned, and 80 tooth slabs were obtained. The specimens were assigned to two groups, which were divided into four subgroups(n = 10). Group 1 [enamel (e)], treated with 37% phosphoric acid (A) + Ketac nano-primer (K); group 2 [dentin (d)], (A) + (K); group 3(e), Er:YAG laser etching (L) + (A) + (K); group 4(d), (L) + (A) + (K); group 5(e), (L) + (K); group 6(d), (L) + (K); group 7(e), (K); group 8(d), (K). The SBS of the specimens was measured with a universal test machine (1 mm/min). Data were analyzed by independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a post-hoc Duncan test (p < 0.05). No difference was determined between groups 3 and 5 (p > 0.05). Group 7 exhibited higher SBS values than those of groups 3 and 5 (p < 0.05). Group 1 showed higher SBSs than those of groups 3, 5 and 7 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups 4 and 6 (p > 0.05). No difference was observed between groups 2 and 4 (p > 0.05). However, group 2 presented higher SBSs than did group 6 (p < 0.05). Group 8 exhibited the highest SBS values when compared with groups 2, 4 and 6 (p < 0.05). Er:YAG laser adversely affected the adhesion of the light-curing nano-ionomer restorative to both enamel and dentin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19688586     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-009-0718-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  44 in total

1.  Shear bond strength of resin-modified restorative glass-ionomer cements to dentin--an in vitro study.

Authors:  R Arora; S D Deshpande
Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent       Date:  1998-12

2.  Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives.

Authors:  B T Rosa; J Perdigão
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.677

3.  A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces.

Authors:  M G BUONOCORE
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Factors that affect the shear bond strength of multiple component and single bottle adhesives to dentin.

Authors:  Keith Titley; Richard Caldwell; Gajanan Kulkarni
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resin composites to dentin.

Authors:  A I Abdalla; F García-Godoy
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.522

6.  Caries inhibition by fluoride-releasing primers.

Authors:  L J Kerber; K J Donly
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 7.  Glass ionomer cements and future research.

Authors:  G J Mount
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.522

8.  Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin.

Authors:  F R Tay; R J Smales; H Ngo; S H Wei; D H Pashley
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel.

Authors:  Eileen A Glasspoole; Robert L Erickson; Carel L Davidson
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva.

Authors:  E Silverman; M Cohen; R S Demke; M Silverman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  6 in total

1.  Minimal intervention dentistry II: part 7. Minimal intervention in cariology: the role of glass-ionomer cements in the preservation of tooth structures against caries.

Authors:  H Ngo; S Opsahl-Vital
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  Aliaa Mohamed El Wakeel; Dina Wafik Elkassas; Mai Mahmoud Yousry
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

3.  The assessment of surface roughness and microleakage of eroded tooth-colored dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Thulfiqar Ali Hussein; Wan Zaripah Wan Bakar; Zuryati Ab Ghani; Dasmawati Mohamad
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-11

4.  Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Enamel Prepared By Er:YAG Laser and Conventional Acid-Etching.

Authors:  M H Hosseini; F Namvar; J Chalipa; K Saber; N Chiniforush; S Sarmadi; A H Mirhashemi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-03-31

5.  Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer to Enamel in Bur-Prepared or Lased Teeth (Er:YAG).

Authors:  Ahmad Jafari; Sima Shahabi; Nasim Chiniforush; Ali Shariat
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31

Review 6.  Modifications in Glass Ionomer Cements: Nano-Sized Fillers and Bioactive Nanoceramics.

Authors:  Shariq Najeeb; Zohaib Khurshid; Muhammad Sohail Zafar; Abdul Samad Khan; Sana Zohaib; Juan Manuel Nuñez Martí; Salvatore Sauro; Jukka Pekka Matinlinna; Ihtesham Ur Rehman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.