Literature DB >> 19688402

Quality assurance in flexible sigmoidoscopy: medical and nonmedical endoscopists.

Sushil Maslekar1, Philip Waudby, Ged Avery, J R T Monson, Graeme Scott Duthie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The clinical assessment of position in colon and hence completion during flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is believed to be inaccurate. The technique of applying endomucosal clips with follow-up X-ray has previously been used for establishing completion in colonoscopy. Furthermore, we have now trained non-healthcare professionals (non-medical endoscopists, NME) to perform FS, but there is no data on assessment of their performance of FS. We performed this study with the aims of determining accuracy of endoscopists' clinical impression regarding actual position of endoscope in colon during FS, comparing medical (ME) and NME in terms of clinical accuracy, and to determine role of endomucosal clips with follow-up X-rays in documenting completion and hence quality assurance.
METHODS: All patients undergoing elective FS, except those with surgical resection, were included, after ethics approval. During FS, endoscopist applied an endomucosal clip at most proximal bowel reached and endoscopists recorded their independent opinion about position of clip. Post procedure, all patients underwent an abdominal X-ray, reported by consultant radiologist, blinded to outcome of FS. X-ray results were compared with endoscopist findings. Complete FS was defined as one where descending colon was reached.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients, with median age of 55 years, participated in study. The endoscopists were accurate in their assessment of position in colon in 38 patients (75%). The attending nurse was accurate in only 31% of cases. The crude and corrected completion rates were 73% and 84%, respectively. There was no correlation between length of endoscope and its position in colon. There were no differences between NME and ME in terms of clinical accuracy.
CONCLUSION: This study has shown that clinical impression of endoscopist during FS regarding position is not very accurate, implying need for regular quality assurance. The technique of applying endomucosal clips with follow-on abdominal X-ray is an excellent objective measure of quality assurance in FS. NME can perform FS with comparable completion rates and accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19688402     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0553-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

Review 1.  Rectal bleeding: when is it right to refer?

Authors:  M Thompson; D Prytherch
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1996-03

2.  Difficult or incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for a screening programme.

Authors:  B T Stewart; J O Keck; A V Duncan; N M Santamaria; P Allen
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1999-01

3.  Anatomical extent of fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  G A Lehman; D M Buchner; J C Lappas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  W S Atkin; J Cuzick; J M Northover; D K Whynes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy and whole colonic imaging in the diagnosis of cancer in patients with colorectal symptoms.

Authors:  M R Thompson; K G Flashman; K Wooldrage; P A Rogers; A Senapati; D P O'Leary; W Atkin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J V Selby; G D Friedman; C P Quesenberry; N S Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  How accurate is the endoscopist's assessment of visualization of the left colon seen at flexible sigmoidoscopy?

Authors: 
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  The prevention of invasive cancer of the rectum.

Authors:  V A Gilbertsen; J M Nelms
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group.

Authors:  T R Levin; F A Farraye; R E Schoen; G Hoff; W Atkin; J H Bond; S Winawer; R W Burt; D A Johnson; L M Kirk; S C Litin; D K Rex
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  W S Atkin; C F Cook; J Cuzick; R Edwards; J M A Northover; J Wardle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Non-physician endoscopists: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maximilian Stephens; Luke F Hourigan; Mark Appleyard; George Ostapowicz; Mark Schoeman; Paul V Desmond; Jane M Andrews; Michael Bourke; David Hewitt; David A Margolin; Gerald J Holtmann
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Is There a Place for Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy?

Authors:  Doron Boltin; Yaron Niv
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.