Literature DB >> 19688366

Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases-software-assisted evaluation of the ablation zone in MDCT: tumor-free follow-up versus local recurrent disease.

Sebastian Keil1, Philipp Bruners, Katharina Schiffl, Martin Sedlmair, Georg Mühlenbruch, Rolf W Günther, Marco Das, Andreas H Mahnken.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in change of size and CT value between local recurrences and tumor-free areas after CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic metastases during follow-up by means of dedicated software for automatic evaluation of hepatic lesions. Thirty-two patients with 54 liver metastases from breast or colorectal cancer underwent triphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) to evaluate hepatic metastatic spread and localization before CT-guided RFA and for follow-up after intervention. Sixteen of these patients (65.1 + or - 10.3 years) with 30 metastases stayed tumor-free (group 1), while the other group (n = 16 with 24 metastases; 62.0 + or - 13.8 years) suffered from local recurrent disease (group 2). Applying an automated software tool (SyngoCT Oncology; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany), size parameters (volume, RECIST, WHO) and attenuation were measured within the lesions before, 1 day after, and 28 days after RFA treatment. The natural logarithm (ln) of the quotient of the volume 1 day versus 28 days after RFA treament was computed: lnQ1//28/0(volume). Analogously, ln ratios of RECIST, WHO, and attenuation were computed and statistically evaluated by repeated-measures ANOVA. One lesion in group 2 was excluded from further evaluation due to automated missegmentation. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed with respect to initial volume, RECIST, and WHO (p < 0.05). Furthermore, ln ratios corresponding to volume, RECIST, and WHO differed significantly between the two groups. Attenuation evaluations showed no significant differences, but there was a trend toward attenuation assessment for the parameter lnQ28/0(attenuation) (p = 0.0527), showing higher values for group 1 (-0.4 + or - 0.3) compared to group 2 (-0.2 + or - 0.2). In conclusion, hepatic metastases and their zone of coagulation necrosis after RFA differed significantly between tumor-free and local-recurrent ablation zones with respect to the corresponding size parameters. A new parameter (lnQ1//28/0(volume/RECIST/WHO/attenuation)) was introduced, which appears to be of prognostic value at early follow-up CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19688366     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-009-9681-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

1.  Margin size is an independent predictor of local tumor progression after ablation of colon cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Joseph P Erinjeri; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Kinh G Do; Karen T Brown; Anne M Covey; Lynn A Brody; William Alago; Raymond H Thornton; Nancy E Kemeny; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update.

Authors:  Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Microwave ablation for colorectal cancer metastasis to the liver: a single-center retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Emily A Knott; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sam J Lubner; John F Swietlik; Sharon M Weber; Annie M Zlevor; Colin Longhurst; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Daniel L Mulkerin; Daniel E Abbott; Dustin Deming; Noelle K LoConte; Nataliya Uboha; Allison B Couillard; Shane A Wells; Paul F Laeseke; Marci L Alexander; Fred T Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-08

4.  3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Nikiforos Vasiniotis Kamarinos; Mithat Gonen; Vlasios Sotirchos; Elena Kaye; Elena N Petre; Stephen B Solomon; Joseph P Erinjeri; Etay Ziv; Assen Kirov; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.753

Review 5.  Local Treatments in the Unresectable Patient with Colorectal Cancer Metastasis: A Review from the Point of View of the Medical Oncologist.

Authors:  Javier Torres-Jiménez; Jorge Esteban-Villarrubia; Reyes Ferreiro-Monteagudo; Alfredo Carrato
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Biopsy and Margins Optimize Outcomes after Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Nikiforos Vasiniotis Kamarinos; Efsevia Vakiani; Mithat Gonen; Nancy E Kemeny; Carlie Sigel; Leonard B Saltz; Karen T Brown; Anne M Covey; Joseph P Erinjeri; Lynn A Brody; Etay Ziv; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Henry Kunin; Afsar Barlas; Elena N Petre; Peter T Kingham; Michael I D'Angelica; Katia Manova-Todorova; Stephen B Solomon; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Comparison of Chronologic Change in the Size and Contrast-Enhancement of Ablation Zones on CT Images after Irreversible Electroporation and Radiofrequency Ablation.

Authors:  Jonas Scheck; Philipp Bruners; David Schindler; Christiane Kuhl; Peter Isfort
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.