PURPOSE: Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) are members of the TGF-beta superfamily and it has been demonstrated that BMPs enhance migration, invasion and metastasis. The purpose of this study was to identify the association between the serum BMP-2 level and the progression status of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with metastatic gastric cancer (metastatic disease group), six patients with early gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis (the EGC group), and ten healthy control subjects were enrolled in this study. The serum BMP-2 level was quantified by use of a commercially available ELISA kit. In EGC group patients and patients with metastatic disease, whole blood was obtained before endoscopic mucosal resection and before the commencement of a scheduled cycle of systemic chemotherapy, respectively. RESULTS: No significant difference in the mean serum BMP-2 levels was observed between the control subjects and the EGC group patients (87.95 pg/ml for the control subjects and 84.50 pg/ml for the EGC group, p=1.0). However, the metastatic disease group patients had a significantly higher level of serum BMP (179.61 pg/ml) than the control subjects and EGC group patients (87.95 pg/ml for the control subjects and 84.50 pg/ml for the EGC group, p<0.0001). Moreover, the mean serum BMP-2 level from patients with a bone metastasis was significantly higher than the mean serum BMP-2 level from patients without a bone metastasis (204.73 pg/ml versus 173.33 pg/ml, p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: BMP-2 seems to have a role in progression to metastatic disease in gastric cancer, especially in the late stage of tumorigenesis, including invasion and metastasis. BMP-2 may facilitate bone metastasis in gastric cancer. To confirm these findings, further studies are required with tissue specimens and the use of a cancer cell line.
PURPOSE: Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) are members of the TGF-beta superfamily and it has been demonstrated that BMPs enhance migration, invasion and metastasis. The purpose of this study was to identify the association between the serum BMP-2 level and the progression status of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with metastatic gastric cancer (metastatic disease group), six patients with early gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis (the EGC group), and ten healthy control subjects were enrolled in this study. The serum BMP-2 level was quantified by use of a commercially available ELISA kit. In EGC group patients and patients with metastatic disease, whole blood was obtained before endoscopic mucosal resection and before the commencement of a scheduled cycle of systemic chemotherapy, respectively. RESULTS: No significant difference in the mean serum BMP-2 levels was observed between the control subjects and the EGC group patients (87.95 pg/ml for the control subjects and 84.50 pg/ml for the EGC group, p=1.0). However, the metastatic disease group patients had a significantly higher level of serum BMP (179.61 pg/ml) than the control subjects and EGC group patients (87.95 pg/ml for the control subjects and 84.50 pg/ml for the EGC group, p<0.0001). Moreover, the mean serum BMP-2 level from patients with a bone metastasis was significantly higher than the mean serum BMP-2 level from patients without a bone metastasis (204.73 pg/ml versus 173.33 pg/ml, p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS:BMP-2 seems to have a role in progression to metastatic disease in gastric cancer, especially in the late stage of tumorigenesis, including invasion and metastasis. BMP-2 may facilitate bone metastasis in gastric cancer. To confirm these findings, further studies are required with tissue specimens and the use of a cancer cell line.
Entities:
Keywords:
BMP-2; Bone morphogenesis protein-2; Invasion; Neoplasm metastasis; Stomach neoplasms
Authors: Joachim H Clement; Martin Raida; Jörg Sänger; Roy Bicknell; Jingwen Liu; Anke Naumann; Annette Geyer; Anja Waldau; Peter Hortschansky; Andreas Schmidt; Klaus Höffken; Stefan Wölft; Adrian L Harris Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Brian T Feeley; Lucie Krenek; Nancy Liu; Wellington K Hsu; Seth C Gamradt; Edward M Schwarz; Johnny Huard; Jay R Lieberman Journal: Bone Date: 2005-08-26 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: S G M Piccirillo; B A Reynolds; N Zanetti; G Lamorte; E Binda; G Broggi; H Brem; A Olivi; F Dimeco; A L Vescovi Journal: Nature Date: 2006-12-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yun-Jung Choi; Patrick N Ingram; Kun Yang; Lan Coffman; Mangala Iyengar; Shoumei Bai; Dafydd G Thomas; Euisik Yoon; Ronald J Buckanovich Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yong Park; Myoung Hee Kang; Hee Yeon Seo; Joong Min Park; Chul Won Choi; Yeul Hong Kim; In Sun Kim; Jun Suk Kim; Sang Cheul Oh Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 3.064