Literature DB >> 19687703

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy: incidence and health care cost analysis.

Giannina L Garcés Ambrossi1, Matthew J McGirt, Daniel M Sciubba, Timothy F Witham, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Ziya L Gokaslan, Donlin M Long.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Same-level recurrent lumbar disc herniation complicates outcomes after primary discectomy in a subset of patients. The health care costs associated with the management of this complication are currently unknown. We set out to identify the incidence and health care cost of same-level recurrent disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy at our institution.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 156 consecutive patients undergoing primary single-level lumbar discectomy at one institution. The incidence of symptomatic same-level recurrent disc herniation either responding to conservative therapy or requiring revision discectomy was assessed. Institutional billing and accounting records were reviewed to determine the billing costs of all diagnostic and therapeutic measures used for patients experiencing recurrent disc herniation.
RESULTS: Twelve months after surgery, 141 patients were available for follow-up. Of these patients, 124 (88%) were symptom free or had minimal symptoms not affecting their daily activity. Radiographically proven symptomatic same-level recurrent disc herniation developed in 17 patients (12%) a median of 8 months after primary discectomy. Eleven patients (7%) required revision surgery, whereas 6 (3.9%) responded to conservative therapy alone. Diagnosis and management of recurrent disc herniation were associated with a mean cost of $26,593 per patient, and the mean cost was markedly less for patients responding to conservative treatment ($2315) compared with those requiring revision surgery ($39,836) (P < 0.001). Of 141 primary lumbar discectomies performed at our institution with the patients followed for 1 year, the total cost associated with the management of subsequent recurrent disc herniation was $452,083 ($289,797 per 100 primary discectomies).
CONCLUSION: In our experience, recurrent lumbar disc herniation occurred in more than 10% of patients and was associated with substantial health care costs. Development of novel techniques to prevent recurrent lumbar disc herniation is warranted to decrease the health care costs and morbidity associated with this complication. Prolonged conservative management should be attempted when possible to reduce the health care costs of this complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19687703     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000350224.36213.F9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  54 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

2.  Design Requirements for Annulus Fibrosus Repair: Review of Forces, Displacements, and Material Properties of the Intervertebral Disk and a Summary of Candidate Hydrogels for Repair.

Authors:  Rose G Long; Olivia M Torre; Warren W Hom; Dylan J Assael; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery in two hundred and seven patients.

Authors:  Jiwei Cheng; Hongwei Wang; Wenjie Zheng; Changqing Li; Jian Wang; Zhengfeng Zhang; Bo Huang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Impact of spine surgery complications on costs associated with management of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Samrat Yeramaneni; Chessie Robinson; Richard Hostin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

5.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Risk factors for the need of surgical treatment of a first recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Ratko Yurac; Juan J Zamorano; Fernando Lira; Diego Valiente; Vicente Ballesteros; Alejandro Urzúa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  What is the Rate of Revision Discectomies After Primary Discectomy on a National Scale?

Authors:  Sohrab S Virk; Ashish Diwan; Frank M Phillips; Harvinder Sandhu; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Development of a two-part biomaterial adhesive strategy for annulus fibrosus repair and ex vivo evaluation of implant herniation risk.

Authors:  Tyler J DiStefano; Jennifer O Shmukler; George Danias; Theodor Di Pauli von Treuheim; Warren W Hom; David A Goldberg; Damien M Laudier; Philip R Nasser; Andrew C Hecht; Steven B Nicoll; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Risk factors for early reherniation after lumbar discectomy with or without annular closure: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jenny C Kienzler; Javier Fandino; Erik Van de Kelft; Sandro Eustacchio; Gerrit Joan Bouma
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device.

Authors:  Gerrit J Bouma; Martin Barth; Darko Ledic; Milorad Vilendecic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.