Literature DB >> 19686541

Incorporating physiological and biochemical mechanisms into pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models: a conceptual framework.

Svein G Dahl1, Leon Aarons, Ursula Gundert-Remy, Mats O Karlsson, Yves-Jacques Schneider, Jean-Louis Steimer, Iñaki F Trocóniz.   

Abstract

The aim of this conceptual framework paper is to contribute to the further development of the modelling of effects of drugs or toxic agents by an approach which is based on the underlying physiology and pathology of the biological processes. In general, modelling of data has the purpose (1) to describe experimental data, (2a) to reduce the amount of data resulting from an experiment, e.g. a clinical trial and (2b) to obtain the most relevant parameters, (3) to test hypotheses and (4) to make predictions within the boundaries of experimental conditions, e.g. range of doses tested (interpolation) and out of the boundaries of the experimental conditions, e.g. to extrapolate from animal data to the situation in man. Describing the drug/xenobiotic-target interaction and the chain of biological events following the interaction is the first step to build a biologically based model. This is an approach to represent the underlying biological mechanisms in qualitative and also quantitative terms, thus being inherently connected in many aspects to systems biology. As the systems biology models may contain variables in the order of hundreds connected with differential equations, it is obvious that it is in most cases not possible to assign values to the variables resulting from experimental data. Reduction techniques may be used to create a manageable model which, however, captures the biologically meaningful events in qualitative and quantitative terms. Until now, some success has been obtained by applying empirical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models which describe direct and indirect relationships between the xenobiotic molecule and the effect, including tolerance. Some of the models may have physiological components built in the structure of the model and use parameter estimates from published data. In recent years, some progress toward semi-mechanistic models has been made, examples being chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and glucose-endogenous insulin-antidiabetic drug interactions. We see a way forward by employing approaches to bridge the gap between systems biology and physiologically based kinetic and dynamic models. To be useful for decision making, the 'bridging' model should have a well founded mechanistic basis, but being reduced to the extent that its parameters can be deduced from experimental data, however capturing the biological/clinical essential details so that meaningful predictions and extrapolations can be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19686541     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00456.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-7835            Impact factor:   4.080


  9 in total

Review 1.  Combining the 'bottom up' and 'top down' approaches in pharmacokinetic modelling: fitting PBPK models to observed clinical data.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tsamandouras; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Leon Aarons
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Assessment of glycemic response to an oral glucokinase activator in a proof of concept study: application of a semi-mechanistic, integrated glucose-insulin-glucagon model.

Authors:  Karen B Schneck; Xin Zhang; Robert Bauer; Mats O Karlsson; Vikram P Sinha
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Dose selection using a semi-mechanistic integrated glucose-insulin-glucagon model: designing phase 2 trials for a novel oral glucokinase activator.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Karen Schneck; Juliana Bue-Valleskey; Kwee Poo Yeo; Michael Heathman; Vikram Sinha
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Inhibition of snowshoe hare succinate dehydrogenase activity as a mechanism of deterrence for papyriferic acid in birch.

Authors:  Jennifer Sorensen Forbey; Xinzhu Pu; Dong Xu; Knut Kielland; John Bryant
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  In vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models in anti-infective drug development: focus on TB.

Authors:  Pavan K Vaddady; Richard E Lee; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.808

6.  Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Intra-arterial Nimodipine Therapy for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-Related Cerebral Vasospasm.

Authors:  F Seker; J Hesser; M A Brockmann; E Neumaier-Probst; C Groden; R Schubert; C Brockmann
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 7.  Drug Exposure to Establish Pharmacokinetic-Response Relationships in Oncology.

Authors:  Belén P Solans; María Jesús Garrido; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Physiologically based toxicokinetic modelling as a tool to support risk assessment: three case studies.

Authors:  Hans Mielke; Ursula Gundert-Remy
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-09

9.  Physiological fidelity or model parsimony? The relative performance of reverse-toxicokinetic modeling approaches.

Authors:  Michael A Rowland; Edward J Perkins; Michael L Mayo
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2017-03-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.