Literature DB >> 19684134

Rbf promotes biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus via repression of icaR, a negative regulator of icaADBC.

David Cue1, Mei G Lei, Thanh T Luong, Lisa Kuechenmeister, Paul M Dunman, Sinead O'Donnell, Sarah Rowe, James P O'Gara, Chia Y Lee.   

Abstract

We previously reported the identification of a gene, rbf, involved in the regulation of biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4. In an effort to study the mechanism of regulation, microarrays were used to compare the transcription profiles of the wild-type strain with an rbf mutant and an rbf overexpression strain of the clinical isolate UAMS-1. Among the genes affected by rbf overexpression are those of the intercellular adhesion (ica) locus; however, expression of these genes was not affected by an rbf deletion in the chromosome. The icaADBC genes are responsible for production of poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PNAG), a major constituent of biofilm. The icaR gene encodes a negative regulator of icaADBC. In UAMS-1 carrying an Rbf-encoding plasmid, Rbf was found to repress icaR transcription with a concomitant increase in icaADBC expression and increased PNAG and biofilm production relative to isogenic strains lacking the plasmid. Sequencing of the rbf gene from UAMS-1 showed that there was a 2-bp insertion affecting the 50th codon of the rbf open reading frame, suggesting that rbf is a pseudogene in UAMS-1. This finding explains why deletion of rbf had no effect on biofilm formation in UAMS-1. To further characterize the Rbf regulation on biofilm we compared biofilm formation, icaA and icaR transcription, and PNAG production in 8325-4 and its isogenic rbf and icaR single mutants and an rbf icaR double mutant. Our results are consistent with a model wherein rbf represses synthesis of icaR, which in turn results in derepression of icaADBC and increased PNAG production. Furthermore, purified rbf did not bind to the icaR or icaA promoter region, suggesting that rbf controls expression of an unknown factor(s) that represses icaR. The role of rbf in controlling the S. aureus biofilm phenotype was further demonstrated in a clinical strain, MW2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19684134      PMCID: PMC2753044          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00913-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  54 in total

1.  Type III secretion chaperone-dependent regulation: activation of virulence genes by SicA and InvF in Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  K H Darwin; V L Miller
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Repression of the Escherichia coli melR promoter by MelR: evidence that efficient repression requires the formation of a repression loop.

Authors:  J T Wade; T A Belyaeva; E I Hyde; S J Busby
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Rns, a virulence regulator within the AraC family, requires binding sites upstream and downstream of its own promoter to function as an activator.

Authors:  G P Munson; J R Scott
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Cynthia B Whitchurch; Tim Tolker-Nielsen; Paula C Ragas; John S Mattick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Direct quantitative transcript analysis of the agr regulon of Staphylococcus aureus during human infection in comparison to the expression profile in vitro.

Authors:  C Goerke; S Campana; M G Bayer; G Döring; K Botzenhart; C Wolz
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 6.  Staphylococcus and biofilms.

Authors:  Friedrich Götz
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.501

7.  Alternative transcription factor sigma(B) is involved in regulation of biofilm expression in a Staphylococcus aureus mucosal isolate.

Authors:  S Rachid; K Ohlsen; U Wallner; J Hacker; M Hecker; W Ziebuhr
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Anaerobic conditions induce expression of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  S E Cramton; M Ulrich; F Götz; G Döring
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  A new two-component regulatory system involved in adhesion, autolysis, and extracellular proteolytic activity of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B Fournier; D C Hooper
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The sbcDC locus mediates repression of type 5 capsule production as part of the SOS response in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Zhongyi Chen; Thanh T Luong; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  32 in total

1.  Rsp inhibits attachment and biofilm formation by repressing fnbA in Staphylococcus aureus MW2.

Authors:  Mei G Lei; David Cue; Christelle M Roux; Paul M Dunman; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Quantitative Expression Analysis of SpA, FnbA and Rsp Genes in Staphylococcus aureus: Actively Associated in the Formation of Biofilms.

Authors:  Sthanikam Yeswanth; Abhijit Chaudhury; Potukuchi Venkata Gurunadha Krishna Sarma
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  σB Inhibits Poly-N-Acetylglucosamine Exopolysaccharide Synthesis and Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jaione Valle; Maite Echeverz; Iñigo Lasa
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease.

Authors:  Nathan K Archer; Mark J Mazaitis; J William Costerton; Jeff G Leid; Mary Elizabeth Powers; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.882

5.  Cigarette smoke increases Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation via oxidative stress.

Authors:  Ritwij Kulkarni; Swati Antala; Alice Wang; Fábio E Amaral; Ryan Rampersaud; Samuel J Larussa; Paul J Planet; Adam J Ratner
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Staphylococcus aureus ClpC divergently regulates capsule via sae and codY in strain newman but activates capsule via codY in strain UAMS-1 and in strain Newman with repaired saeS.

Authors:  Thanh T Luong; Keya Sau; Christelle Roux; Subrata Sau; Paul M Dunman; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Impact of food-related environmental factors on the adherence and biofilm formation of natural Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  Daniel Vázquez-Sánchez; Olivier Habimana; Askild Holck
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Activation of sarX by Rbf is required for biofilm formation and icaADBC expression in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  David Cue; Mei G Lei; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  AraC-Type Regulator Rbf Controls the Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Phenotype by Negatively Regulating the icaADBC Repressor SarR.

Authors:  Sarah E Rowe; Christopher Campbell; Colm Lowry; Sinead T O'Donnell; Michael E Olson; Jill K Lindgren; Elaine M Waters; Paul D Fey; James P O'Gara
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Natural mutations in a Staphylococcus aureus virulence regulator attenuate cytotoxicity but permit bacteremia and abscess formation.

Authors:  Sudip Das; Claudia Lindemann; Bernadette C Young; Julius Muller; Babett Österreich; Nicola Ternette; Ann-Cathrin Winkler; Kerstin Paprotka; Richard Reinhardt; Konrad U Förstner; Elizabeth Allen; Amy Flaxman; Yuko Yamaguchi; Christine S Rollier; Pauline van Diemen; Sebastian Blättner; Christian W Remmele; Martina Selle; Marcus Dittrich; Tobias Müller; Jörg Vogel; Knut Ohlsen; Derrick W Crook; Ruth Massey; Daniel J Wilson; Thomas Rudel; David H Wyllie; Martin J Fraunholz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.