Literature DB >> 23064971

Impact of food-related environmental factors on the adherence and biofilm formation of natural Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Daniel Vázquez-Sánchez1, Olivier Habimana, Askild Holck.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogenic bacterium capable of developing biofilms on food-processing surfaces, a pathway leading to cross contamination of foods. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of environmental stress factors found during seafood production on the adhesion and biofilm-forming properties of S. aureus. Adhesion and biofilm assays were performed on 26 S. aureus isolated from seafood and two S. aureus reference strains (ATCC 6538 and ATCC 43300). Cell surface properties were evaluated by affinity measurements to solvents in a partitioning test, while adhesion and biofilm assays were performed in polystyrene microplates under different stress conditions of temperature, osmolarity, and nutrient content. The expression of genes implicated in the regulation of biofilm formation (icaA, rbf and σ( B )) was analyzed by reverse transcription and quantitative real time PCR. In general, S. aureus isolates showed moderate hydrophobic properties and a marked Lewis-base character. Initial adhesion to polystyrene was positively correlated with the ionic strength of the growth medium. Most of the strains had a higher biofilm production at 37 °C than at 25 °C, promoted by the addition of glucose, whereas NaCl and MgCl(2) had a lower impact markedly affected by incubation temperatures. Principal Component Analysis revealed a considerable variability in adhesion and biofilm-forming properties between S. aureus isolates. Transcriptional analysis also indicated variations in gene expression between three characteristic isolates under different environmental conditions. These results suggested that the prevalence of S. aureus strains on food-processing surfaces is above all conditioned by the ability to adapt to the environmental stress conditions present during food production. These findings are relevant for food safety and may be of importance when choosing the safest environmental conditions and material during processing, packaging, and storage of seafood products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23064971     DOI: 10.1007/s00284-012-0247-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


  42 in total

1.  Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions--its mechanisms and methods for study.

Authors:  R Bos; H C van der Mei; H J Busscher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 2.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.

Authors:  J W Costerton; K J Cheng; G G Geesey; T I Ladd; J C Nickel; M Dasgupta; T J Marrie
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 15.500

3.  Formation of biofilm by Staphylococcus xylosus.

Authors:  S Planchon; B Gaillard-Martinie; E Dordet-Frisoni; M N Bellon-Fontaine; S Leroy; J Labadie; M Hébraud; R Talon
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Incidence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in fishery products marketed in Galicia (Northwest Spain).

Authors:  Daniel Vázquez-Sánchez; Marta López-Cabo; Paula Saá-Ibusquiza; Juan José Rodríguez-Herrera
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation.

Authors:  C Cucarella; C Solano; J Valle; B Amorena; I Lasa ; J R Penadés
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Surface physicochemical analysis of natural Lactococcus lactis strains reveals the existence of hydrophobic and low charged strains with altered adhesive properties.

Authors:  Efstathios Giaouris; Marie-Pierre Chapot-Chartier; Romain Briandet
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates.

Authors:  Elke Peeters; Hans J Nelis; Tom Coenye
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.363

8.  Identification of a 5-nucleotide sequence that controls expression of the ica locus in Staphylococcus aureus and characterization of the DNA-binding properties of IcaR.

Authors:  Kimberly K Jefferson; Sarah E Cramton; Friedrich Götz; Gerald B Pier
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Influence of magnesium ions on biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  Bo Song; Laura G Leff
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 5.415

Review 10.  ica and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  James P O'Gara
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  10 in total

1.  Immobilized Hydrolytic Enzymes Exhibit Antibiofilm Activity Against Escherichia coli at Sub-Lethal Concentrations.

Authors:  Federica Villa; Francesco Secundo; Andrea Polo; Francesca Cappitelli
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Resilience in the Face of Uncertainty: Sigma Factor B Fine-Tunes Gene Expression To Support Homeostasis in Gram-Positive Bacteria.

Authors:  Claudia Guldimann; Kathryn J Boor; Martin Wiedmann; Veronica Guariglia-Oropeza
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Degradation of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Using Hydrolytic Enzymes Produced by Amazonian Endophytic Fungi.

Authors:  Rosiane Rodrigues Matias; Ana Milena Gómez Sepúlveda; Bárbara Nunes Batista; Juliana Mesquita Vidal Martínez de Lucena; Patrícia Melchionna Albuquerque
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.926

4.  Laurus nobilis, Zingiber officinale and Anethum graveolens Essential Oils: Composition, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities against Bacteria Isolated from Fish and Shellfish.

Authors:  Mejdi Snuossi; Najla Trabelsi; Sabrine Ben Taleb; Ameni Dehmeni; Guido Flamini; Vincenzo De Feo
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Sangma Xie; Xiuqin Lou; Shi Cheng; Xiaodong Liu; Wei Zheng; Zhibei Zheng; Haoqiu Wang
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Effect of NaCl on Biofilm Formation of the Isolate from Staphylococcus aureus Outbreak Linked to Ham.

Authors:  Soomin Lee; Kyoung-Hee Choi; Yohan Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 7.  Bacteriophages as Weapons Against Bacterial Biofilms in the Food Industry.

Authors:  Diana Gutiérrez; Lorena Rodríguez-Rubio; Beatriz Martínez; Ana Rodríguez; Pilar García
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Compositional Analysis of Biofilms Formed by Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Food Sources.

Authors:  Elena-Alexandra Oniciuc; Nuno Cerca; Anca I Nicolau
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Biofilm Production Ability, Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Staphylococcus aureus from Various Veterinary Hospitals.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Zi-Yun Tang; Shi-Yun Cui; Zhen-Bao Ma; Hua Deng; Wei-Li Kong; Li-Wen Yang; Chao Lin; Wen-Guang Xiong; Zhen-Ling Zeng
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-04-04

Review 10.  Review on Stress Tolerance in Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Se-Hun Kim; Ramachandran Chelliah; Sudha Rani Ramakrishnan; Ayyappasamy Sudalaiyadum Perumal; Woo-Suk Bang; Momna Rubab; Eric Banan-Mwine Daliri; Kaliyan Barathikannan; Fazle Elahi; Eunji Park; Hyeon Yeong Jo; Su-Bin Hwang; Deog Hwan Oh
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 5.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.