Literature DB >> 19683958

Digene HPV Genotyping RH Test RUO: comparative evaluation with INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra Test for detection of 18 high-risk and probable high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes.

Katja Seme1, Snjezana Zidovec Lepej, Maja M Lunar, Janja Iscić-Bes, Ana Planinić, Bostjan J Kocjan, Adriana Vince, Mario Poljak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standardized and validated methods for the specific detection and identification of a spectrum of high-risk (hr) HPV genotypes will be necessary if HPV genotyping gains an important role in the clinical management of HPV-related precancerous lesions and cancers.
OBJECTIVES: The first comparative evaluation of novel HPV genotyping Digene HPV Genotyping RH Test RUO (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with standard INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra CE assay (Innogenetics, Gent, Belgium). STUDY
DESIGN: Seventy hr-HPV positive samples were tested in parallel with both genotyping assays. The results were interpreted taking into account 15 hr-HPV and 3 probable hr-HPV genotypes that can be identified by both assays (assay-common genotypes).
RESULTS: Concordant results (a complete match of assay-common genotypes or negative using both assays) and compatible results (at least one genotype in common) were obtained in 42 (60.0%) and 28 (40.0%) samples, respectively. No discordant results for assay-common genotypes were obtained. Of 42 samples with compatible results, the presence of at least one assay-common genotype was detected in 37 samples, while no HPV was detected in two samples by both assays and only a single low-risk HPV was detected by INNO-LiPA in three samples.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel Digene test is suitable for the detection of hr-HPV genotypes in clinical samples and it provides comparable results to the well established INNO-LiPA assay. Although INNO-LiPA identified significantly more samples with multiple HPV genotypes than the Digene test, the clinical benefit of such a difference is at present unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19683958     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  4 in total

1.  Novel microsphere-based method for detection and typing of 46 mucosal human papillomavirus types.

Authors:  Vanessa Zubach; Gerry Smart; Samuel Ratnam; Alberto Severini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of commercial reverse line blot assays for human papillomavirus genotyping.

Authors:  Martin Steinau; Juanita M Onyekwuluje; Mariela Z Scarbrough; Elizabeth R Unger; Joakim Dillner; Tiequn Zhou
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Performance of the digene LQ, RH and PS HPVs genotyping systems on clinical samples and comparison with HC2 and PCR-based Linear Array.

Authors:  Jose M Godínez; Sara Tous; Nuria Baixeras; Judith Moreno-Crespi; María Alejo; Marylène Lejeune; Ignacio G Bravo; F Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.965

4.  Human Papillomavirus Status and the Risk of Cerebrovascular Events Following Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Addison; Sara B Seidelmann; Sumbal A Janjua; Hamed Emami; Pedro V Staziaki; Travis R Hallett; Bálint Szilveszter; Michael T Lu; Richard P Cambria; Udo Hoffmann; Annie W Chan; Lori J Wirth; Tomas G Neilan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.