Literature DB >> 19683478

DNA lesions sequestered in micronuclei induce a local defective-damage response.

Mariona Terradas1, Marta Martín, Laura Tusell, Anna Genescà.   

Abstract

Micronuclei are good markers of chromosome instability and, among other disturbances, are closely related to double-strand break induction. The ability of DNA lesions sequestered in the micronuclear bodies to activate the complex damage-signalling network is highly controversial since some repair factors have not been consistently detected inside micronuclei. In order to better understand the efficiency of the response induced by micronuclear DNA damage, we have analyzed the presence of DNA damage-response factors and DNA degradation markers in these structures. Radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks produce a modification of chromatin structural proteins, such as the H2AX histone, which is rapidly phosphorylated around the break site. Strikingly, we have been able to distinguish two different phosphoH2AX (gammaH2AX) labelling patterns in micronuclei: discrete foci, indicating DSB presence, and uniform labelling affecting the whole micronucleus, pointing to genomic DNA fragmentation. At early post-irradiation times we observed a high fraction of micronuclei displaying gammaH2AX foci. Co-localization experiments showed that only a small fraction of the DSBs in micronuclei were able to properly recruit the p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) and the meiotic recombination 11 (MRE11). We suggest that trafficking defects through the micronuclear envelope compromise the recruitment of DNA damage-response factors. In contrast to micronuclei displaying gammaH2AX foci, we observed that micronuclei showing a gammaH2AX extensive-uniform labelling were more frequently observed at substantial post-irradiation times. By means of TUNEL assay, we proved that DNA degradation was carried out inside these micronuclei. Given this scenario, we propose that micronuclei carrying a non-repaired DSB are conduced to their elimination, thus favouring chromosome instability in terms of allele loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19683478     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  45 in total

1.  DNA damage to a single chromosome end delays anaphase onset.

Authors:  Bárbara Alcaraz Silva; Jessica R Stambaugh; Kyoko Yokomori; Jagesh V Shah; Michael W Berns
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Y chromothripsis?

Authors:  Emily M Hatch
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Chronic p53-independent p21 expression causes genomic instability by deregulating replication licensing.

Authors:  Panagiotis Galanos; Konstantinos Vougas; David Walter; Alexander Polyzos; Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Emma J Haagensen; Antonis Kokkalis; Fani-Marlen Roumelioti; Sarantis Gagos; Maria Tzetis; Begoña Canovas; Ana Igea; Akshay K Ahuja; Ralph Zellweger; Sofia Havaki; Emanuel Kanavakis; Dimitris Kletsas; Igor B Roninson; Spiros D Garbis; Massimo Lopes; Angel Nebreda; Dimitris Thanos; J Julian Blow; Paul Townsend; Claus Storgaard Sørensen; Jiri Bartek; Vassilis G Gorgoulis
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Replication stress-induced endogenous DNA damage drives cellular senescence induced by a sub-lethal oxidative stress.

Authors:  Gireedhar Venkatachalam; Uttam Surana; Marie-Véronique Clément
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei.

Authors:  Emily M Hatch; Andrew H Fischer; Thomas J Deerinck; Martin W Hetzer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Meiotic silencing and fragmentation of the male germline restricted chromosome in zebra finch.

Authors:  Sam Schoenmakers; Evelyne Wassenaar; Joop S E Laven; J Anton Grootegoed; Willy M Baarends
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 8.  Chromothripsis and telomere crisis: engines of genome instability.

Authors:  Sally M Dewhurst
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 9.  Rebuilding Chromosomes After Catastrophe: Emerging Mechanisms of Chromothripsis.

Authors:  Peter Ly; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 20.808

10.  Chromoanagenesis and cancer: mechanisms and consequences of localized, complex chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Andrew J Holland; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 53.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.