Literature DB >> 19683232

Analysis of pain and satisfaction with office-based hysteroscopic sterilization.

Mark Levie1, Gil Weiss, Bente Kaiser, Jennifer Daif, Scott G Chudnoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess pain and patient satisfaction with office-based hysteroscopic sterilization.
DESIGN: This prospective, observational study was designed to assess patient pain perception and satisfaction with office-based hysteroscopic sterilization using the Essure device (Conceptus, Mountain View, CA).
SETTING: Faculty practice office at an inner-city urban medical center. PATIENT(S): Women seeking hysteroscopic sterilization. INTERVENTION(S): Office hysteroscopic sterilization under local anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pain assessed at the time of the procedure by a 0-10 visual scale and satisfaction by a 1-5 scale. RESULT(S): From June 2003 to June 2006, 209 patients were recruited. The mean scores for average procedural pain, most procedural pain, and average menstrual pain were 2.6+/-2.1, 3.3+/-2.5, and 3.6+/-2.6, respectively. Standardized pain scores revealed that 149 subjects (70%) experienced average pain that was less than or equal to the pain experienced with their menses. Mean satisfaction rating for the procedure was 4.7+/-0.71. CONCLUSION(S): Office-based hysteroscopic sterilization performed with local anesthesia alone is well tolerated, and patients are satisfied with this method for permanent sterilization. Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19683232     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

Review 1.  Update on permanent contraception options for women.

Authors:  Eva Patil; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 2.  A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt.

Authors:  Gabriel Frietze; Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahbubur Rahman; Mahta Rouhani; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 3.  Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  K McMartin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2013-10-01

4.  Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure.

Authors:  Collette R Lessard; Matthew R Hopkins
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Preprocedure patient preferences and attitudes toward permanent contraceptive options.

Authors:  Hector O Chapa; Gonzalo Venegas
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Factors Associated with Negative Patient Experiences with Essure Sterilization.

Authors:  Emilie V J van Limburg Stirum; Nisse V Clark; Alexis Lindsey; Xiangmei Gu; Andreas L Thurkow; Jon I Einarsson; Sarah L Cohen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.