Literature DB >> 1968301

Therapeutic options for the management of upper tract calculi.

J A Motola1, A D Smith.   

Abstract

The cry of "ESWL for all" was heard at the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, and actually, this is not far from the truth. Those physicians who are not familiar with percutaneous techniques, or who do not have the necessary equipment available, may actually attempt ESWL for all calculi regardless of stone burden or location. Patients who are interested in avoiding manipulation may request ESWL, even if the results may not be as good as those obtained with concomitant manipulation or with percutaneous procedures. Nevertheless, indications still exist for percutaneous techniques, and these procedures will not become obsolete even as ESWL technology advances. Studies are being conducted to identify the ideal treatment for all varieties of stones in the genitourinary system. As ESWL and endoscopic technology continue to advance, the treatment of stone disease will continue to change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1968301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  8 in total

Review 1.  Interventional procedures in the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  M P Banner; P Ramchandani; H M Pollack
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  PCNL MONOTHERAPY FOR RENAL CALCULI - AN INITIAL EXPERIENCE.

Authors:  Deepak Batura
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

3.  Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Li-Jen Wang; Yon-Cheong Wong; Cheng-Keng Chuang; Sheng-Hsien Chu; Chih-Shou Chen; Lai-Chu See; Yang-Jen Chiang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  How has extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy changed the treatment of urinary stones in Quebec?

Authors:  A R Levy; M McGregor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The usefulness of stone density and patient stoutness in predicting extracorporeal shock wave efficiency: Results in a North African ethnic group.

Authors:  Hamdoune Abdelaziz; Yassine Elabiad; Ilyas Aderrouj; Abdellatif Janane; Mohamed Ghadouane; Ahmed Ameur; Mohamed Abbar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Outcome of shock wave lithotripsy as monotherapy for large solitary renal stones (>2 cm in size) without stenting.

Authors:  Shanmugasundaram Rajaian; Santosh Kumar; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Ninan K Chacko; Antony Devasia; Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

7.  The effect of stone and patient characteristics in predicting extra-corporal shock wave lithotripsy success rate: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Zubi; Ammar Al Sleibi; Basel Mazen Elayan; Subhi Zahi Al-Issawi; Morad Bani-Hani; Adel Alsharei; Jad AlSmadi; Saleh Abualhaj; Ala' Y Ibrahim
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-10

8.  Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors.

Authors:  Ozgur Yazici; Murat Tuncer; Cahit Sahin; Mehmet K Demirkol; Alper Kafkasli; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.