Literature DB >> 19682530

The benchmark dose approach in food risk assessment: is it applicable and worthwhile?

Stefan D Muri1, Josef R Schlatter, Beat J Brüschweiler.   

Abstract

The benchmark dose (BMD) approach is being increasingly used in the area of food risk assessment because it offers several advantages compared to the conventional no-observed-adverse-effect-level approach. The aim of this work was to check the applicability of the BMD approach on toxicity data available from pesticides, mycotoxins and natural toxins. Based on toxicological evaluations, the pivotal study was identified. Detailed data from the original study were retrieved and used for BMD modelling. Twenty-five studies used for BMD modelling were analysed with regard to study design: total number of animals, number of dose levels, and spacing between dose levels. The quality of the modelled endpoints was evaluated according to the following aspects: BMD/BMDL ratio, test for goodness of fit and BMD in the range of dose levels. If one of these aspects was not fulfilled, the BMD derived from this endpoint was considered to be uncertain to some extent and corresponding modelled data sets were examined. The present work demonstrates that the BMD approach is in principle applicable to pesticides, mycotoxins, and natural toxins. Although large differences relating to data availability and data quality were noticed, 69 of 82 modelled endpoints (84%) fulfilled the three quality aspects of BMD modelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19682530     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  10 in total

1.  Variation in benchmark dose (BMD) and the 95% lower confidence limit of benchmark dose (BMDL) among general Japanese populations with no anthropogenic exposure to cadmium.

Authors:  Sonoko Sakuragi; Ken Takahashi; Tsutomu Hoshuyama; Jiro Moriguchi; Fumiko Ohashi; Yoshinari Fukui; Masayuki Ikeda
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation.

Authors:  R Webster West; Walter W Piegorsch; Edsel A Peña; Lingling An; Wensong Wu; Alissa A Wickens; Hui Xiong; Wenhai Chen
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Comparison of toxicogenomics and traditional approaches to inform mode of action and points of departure in human health risk assessment of benzo[a]pyrene in drinking water.

Authors:  Ivy Moffat; Nikolai Chepelev; Sarah Labib; Julie Bourdon-Lacombe; Byron Kuo; Julie K Buick; France Lemieux; Andrew Williams; Sabina Halappanavar; Amal Malik; Mirjam Luijten; Jiri Aubrecht; Daniel R Hyduke; Albert J Fornace; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Effects of seasons and parts on volatile N-nitrosamines and their exposure and risk assessment in raw chicken and duck meats.

Authors:  Kexin Li; Rui Wang; Xiaoxu Wang; Changxia Sun; Qiang Li
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Benchmark Dose Analysis via Nonparametric Regression Modeling.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Nonparametric estimation of benchmark doses in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Information-theoretic model-averaged benchmark dose analysis in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Lingling An; Alissa A Wickens; R Webster West; Edsel A Peña; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Quantal Risk Assessment Database: A Database for Exploring Patterns in Quantal Dose-Response Data in Risk Assessment and its Application to Develop Priors for Bayesian Dose-Response Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew W Wheeler; Walter W Piegorsch; Albert John Bailer
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  BMDExpress Data Viewer - a visualization tool to analyze BMDExpress datasets.

Authors:  Byron Kuo; A Francina Webster; Russell S Thomas; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.446

10.  Simulation-based assessment of model selection criteria during the application of benchmark dose method to quantal response data.

Authors:  Keita Yoshii; Hiroshi Nishiura; Kaoru Inoue; Takayuki Yamaguchi; Akihiko Hirose
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.432

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.