BACKGROUND: Being able to die in one's place of choice is an indicator of the quality of end-of-life care. GPs may play a key role in exploring and honouring patients' preferences for place of death. AIM: To examine how often GPs are informed about patients' preferred place of death, by whom and for which patients, and to study the expressed preferred place of death and how often patients die at their preferred place. DESIGN OF STUDY: One-year nationwide mortality retrospective study. SETTING: Sentinel Network of GPs in Belgium, 2006. METHOD: GPs' weekly registration of all deaths (patients aged =1 year). RESULTS: A total of 798 non-sudden deaths were reported. GPs were informed of patients' preferred place of death in 46% of cases. GPs obtained this information directly from patients in 63%. GP awareness was positively associated with patients not being hospitalised in the last 3 months of life (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8 to 5.6), involvement of informal caregivers (OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.8 to 6.1), use of a multidisciplinary palliative care team (OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.8 to 3.5), and with presence of more than seven contacts between GP and patient or family in the last 3 months of life (OR = 3.0; 95% CI = 2.2 to 4.3). In instances where GPs were informed, more than half of patients (58%) preferred to die at home. Overall, 80% of patients died at their preferred place. CONCLUSION: GPs are often unaware of their patients' preference for place of death. However, if GPs are informed, patients often die at their preferred location. Several healthcare characteristics might contribute to this and to a higher level of GP awareness.
BACKGROUND: Being able to die in one's place of choice is an indicator of the quality of end-of-life care. GPs may play a key role in exploring and honouring patients' preferences for place of death. AIM: To examine how often GPs are informed about patients' preferred place of death, by whom and for which patients, and to study the expressed preferred place of death and how often patients die at their preferred place. DESIGN OF STUDY: One-year nationwide mortality retrospective study. SETTING: Sentinel Network of GPs in Belgium, 2006. METHOD: GPs' weekly registration of all deaths (patients aged =1 year). RESULTS: A total of 798 non-sudden deaths were reported. GPs were informed of patients' preferred place of death in 46% of cases. GPs obtained this information directly from patients in 63%. GP awareness was positively associated with patients not being hospitalised in the last 3 months of life (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8 to 5.6), involvement of informal caregivers (OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.8 to 6.1), use of a multidisciplinary palliative care team (OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.8 to 3.5), and with presence of more than seven contacts between GP and patient or family in the last 3 months of life (OR = 3.0; 95% CI = 2.2 to 4.3). In instances where GPs were informed, more than half of patients (58%) preferred to die at home. Overall, 80% of patients died at their preferred place. CONCLUSION: GPs are often unaware of their patients' preference for place of death. However, if GPs are informed, patients often die at their preferred location. Several healthcare characteristics might contribute to this and to a higher level of GP awareness.
Authors: Sander D Borgsteede; Luc Deliens; Anneke L Francke; Wim A B Stalman; Dick L Willems; Jacques T M van Eijk; Gerrit van der Wal Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Monica Beccaro; Massimo Costantini; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Guido Miccinesi; Maria Grimaldi; Paolo Bruzzi Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: G Visser; M Klinkenberg; M I Broese van Groenou; D L Willems; C P M Knipscheer; D J H Deeg Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Agnes van der Heide; Luc Deliens; Karin Faisst; Tore Nilstun; Michael Norup; Eugenio Paci; Gerrit van der Wal; Paul J van der Maas Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-08-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thijs Reyniers; Dirk Houttekier; H Roeline Pasman; Robert Vander Stichele; Joachim Cohen; Luc Deliens Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Mette A Neergaard; Peter Vedsted; Frede Olesen; Ineta Sokolowski; Anders B Jensen; Jens Søndergaard Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.386