Literature DB >> 19682170

Clinical value of noninducibility by high-dose isoproterenol versus rapid atrial pacing after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Thomas Crawford1, Aman Chugh, Eric Good, Kentaro Yoshida, Krit Jongnarangsin, Matthew Ebinger, Frank Pelosi, Frank Bogun, Fred Morady, Hakan Oral.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AF can be induced by RAP or ISO in >85% of patients with PAF.
METHODS: ISO was administered in escalating doses of 5, 10, 15, and 20 microg/min in 112 patients (age = 56 +/- 13 years) with PAF before radiofrequency catheter ablation. AF was inducible in 97 of 112 patients (87%) at a mean dose of 15 +/- 5 microg/min. RAP induced AF in the remaining 14 of 15 patients. Antral pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (APVI) was followed by ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) as necessary to terminate AF and render AF noninducible in response to ISO.
RESULTS: AF terminated during APVI in 72 of 111 patients (65%) and after APVI plus ablation of CFAEs in 11 of 111 patients (10%). In the remaining 28 patients (25%), sinus rhythm was restored by transthoracic cardioversion. RAP was performed in the last 61 consecutive patients who were rendered noninducible by ISO. RAP initiated AF in 20 of 61 patients (33%) and atrial flutter in 6 patients (10%). No additional ablation was performed if AF was induced with RAP; however, atrial flutter was targeted. At 12 +/- 5 months, 63/75 patients (84%) who were noninducible by ISO and 2 of 8 (25%) who still were reinducible by ISO were free from recurrent AF after a single ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs (P = 0.001). AF recurred in 20 of 36 patients (56%) who required cardioversion for persistent AF after ablation (P < 0.001). Among the 61 patients who also underwent RAP, 12 of 20 (60%) who were, and 31 of 41 (76%) who were not inducible by RAP were free from recurrent AF (P = 0.21). The accuracy of noninducibility as a predictor of clinical outcome was 83% with ISO and 64% by RAP (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The response to isoproterenol after catheter ablation of PAF more accurately predicts clinical outcome than the response to RAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19682170     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01571.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  10 in total

1.  Isoproterenol infusion increases level of consciousness during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Daniel K O'Neill; Anthony Aizer; Patrick Linton; Marc Bloom; Emily Rose; Larry Chinitz
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Mechanisms of human atrial fibrillation initiation: clinical and computational studies of repolarization restitution and activation latency.

Authors:  David E Krummen; Jason D Bayer; Jeffrey Ho; Gordon Ho; Miriam R Smetak; Paul Clopton; Natalia A Trayanova; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-10-01

3.  What tissue does circumferential PV Isolation actually modulate?

Authors:  Thomas J McGarry; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-14

Review 4.  Non-Inducibility Or Termination As Endpoints Of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: What Is The Role?

Authors:  Matthew Baker; Prabhat Kumar; James P Hummel; Anil K Gehi
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-10-31

5.  A case of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with a non-pulmonary vein trigger identified by intravenous adenosine triphosphate infusion.

Authors:  Masahiro Esato; Naoto Nishina; Yoshitomi Kida; YeongHwa Chun
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-04-22

6.  Predictive value of noninducibility after catheter ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Shinichi Tachibana; Akira Mizukami; Shunsuke Kuroda; Tatsuya Hayashi; Akihiko Matsumura; Masahiko Goya; Tetsuo Sasano
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-03-02

7.  Impact of electrophysiological and pharmacological noninducibility following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Takayuki Otsuka; Koichi Sagara; Takuto Arita; Naoharu Yagi; Shinya Suzuki; Takanori Ikeda; Takeshi Yamashita
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-09-10

8.  Predictive value of the induction test with atrial burst pacing with regard to long-term recurrence after ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kawai; Yasushi Mukai; Shujiro Inoue; Daisuke Yakabe; Kazuhiro Nagaoka; Kazuo Sakamoto; Susumu Takase; Akiko Chishaki; Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2019-01-18

9.  Pulmonary vein isolation plus left atrial posterior wall isolation and additional nonpulmonary vein trigger ablation using high-dose isoproterenol for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tomomasa Takamiya; Junichi Nitta; Akira Sato; Yukihiro Inamura; Nobutaka Kato; Osamu Inaba; Ken Negi; Tsunehiro Yamato; Yutaka Matsumura; Yoshihide Takahashi; Masahiko Goya; Kenzo Hirao
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2019-02-18

10.  Is Atrial Fibrillation Noninducibility by Burst Pacing After Catheter Ablation Associated With Reduced Clinical Recurrence?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hualong Liu; Ping Yuan; Xin Zhu; Linghua Fu; Kui Hong; Jinzhu Hu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.