BACKGROUND: The biological basis of frailty has been difficult to establish owing to the lack of a standard definition, its complexity, and its frequent coexistence with illness. OBJECTIVE: To establish the biological correlates of frailty in the presence and absence of concurrent cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Participants were 4735 community-dwelling adults 65 years and older. Frail, intermediate, and nonfrail subjects were identified by a validated screening tool and exclusion criteria. Bivariate relationships between frailty level and physiological measures were evaluated by Pearson chi2 tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance F tests for continuous variables. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to evaluate multivariable relationships between frailty status and physiological measures. RESULTS: Of 4735 Cardiovascular Health Study participants, 299 (6.3%) were identified as frail, 2147 (45.3%) as intermediate, and 2289 (48.3%) as not frail. Frail vs nonfrail participants had increased mean +/- SD levels of C-reactive protein (5.5 +/- 9.8 vs 2.7 +/- 4.0 mg/L), factor VIII (13 790 +/- 4480 vs 11 860 +/- 3460 mg/dL), and, in a smaller subset, D dimer (647 +/- 1033 vs 224 +/- 258 ng/mL) (P< or =.001 for all, chi2 test for trend). These differences persisted when individuals with cardiovascular disease and diabetes were excluded and after adjustment for age, sex, and race. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that there is a specific physiological basis to the geriatric syndrome of frailty that is characterized in part by increased inflammation and elevated markers of blood clotting and that these physiological differences persist when those with diabetes and cardiovascular disease are excluded.
BACKGROUND: The biological basis of frailty has been difficult to establish owing to the lack of a standard definition, its complexity, and its frequent coexistence with illness. OBJECTIVE: To establish the biological correlates of frailty in the presence and absence of concurrent cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. METHODS:Participants were 4735 community-dwelling adults 65 years and older. Frail, intermediate, and nonfrail subjects were identified by a validated screening tool and exclusion criteria. Bivariate relationships between frailty level and physiological measures were evaluated by Pearson chi2 tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance F tests for continuous variables. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to evaluate multivariable relationships between frailty status and physiological measures. RESULTS: Of 4735 Cardiovascular Health Study participants, 299 (6.3%) were identified as frail, 2147 (45.3%) as intermediate, and 2289 (48.3%) as not frail. Frail vs nonfrail participants had increased mean +/- SD levels of C-reactive protein (5.5 +/- 9.8 vs 2.7 +/- 4.0 mg/L), factor VIII (13 790 +/- 4480 vs 11 860 +/- 3460 mg/dL), and, in a smaller subset, D dimer (647 +/- 1033 vs 224 +/- 258 ng/mL) (P< or =.001 for all, chi2 test for trend). These differences persisted when individuals with cardiovascular disease and diabetes were excluded and after adjustment for age, sex, and race. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that there is a specific physiological basis to the geriatric syndrome of frailty that is characterized in part by increased inflammation and elevated markers of blood clotting and that these physiological differences persist when those with diabetes and cardiovascular disease are excluded.
Authors: Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Andrew Law; Jingwen Tan; Cassandra Delp; Elizabeth A King; Babak Orandi; Megan Salter; Nada Alachkar; Niraj Desai; Morgan Grams; Jeremy Walston; Dorry L Segev Journal: Transplantation Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: John A Batsis; Jeanne M Huddleston; L Joseph Melton; Paul M Huddleston; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Dirk R Larson; Rachel E Gullerud; M Molly McMahon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Damani A Piggott; Ravi Varadhan; Shruti H Mehta; Todd T Brown; Huifen Li; Jeremy D Walston; Sean X Leng; Gregory D Kirk Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Sameera A Talegawkar; Stefania Bandinelli; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Ping Chen; Yuri Milaneschi; Toshiko Tanaka; Richard D Semba; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Nutr Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Candace K McClure; Samar R El Khoudary; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Kelly R Ylitalo; Kristin Tomey; Trang VoPham; Barbara Sternfeld; Jane A Cauley; Siobán Harlow Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 4.032