Literature DB >> 19675510

Trends in health care expenditures, utilization, and health status among US adults with spine problems, 1997-2006.

Brook I Martin1, Judith A Turner, Sohail K Mirza, Michael J Lee, Bryan A Comstock, Richard A Deyo.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Analysis of nationally representative survey data for spine-related health care expenditures, utilization and self-reported health status.
OBJECTIVE: To study trends from 1997 to 2006 in per-user expenditures for spine-related inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy, and emergency services; and to compare these trends to changes in health status. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although prior work has shown overall spine-related expenditures accounted for $86 billion in 2005, increasing 65% since 1997, the study did not report per-user expenditures. Understanding population-level per-user expenditure for specific services relative to changes in the health status may help assess the value of these services.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a multistage survey sample designed to produce unbiased national estimates of health care utilization and expenditure. Spine-related hospitalizations, outpatient visits, prescription medications and emergency department visits were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Regression analyses controlling for age, sex, comorbidity, and time (years) were used to examine trends from 1997 to 2006 in inflation-adjusted per-user expenditures, and utilization, and self-reported health status.
RESULTS: An average of 1774 respondents with spine problems was surveyed per year; the proportion suggested an increase in the number of people who sought treatment for spine problems in the United States from 14.8 million in 1997 to 21.9 million in 2006. From 1997 to 2006, the mean adjusted per-user expenditures were the largest component of increasing total costs for inpatient hospitalizations, prescription medications, andemergency department visits, increasing 37% (from $13,040 in 1997 to $17,909 in 2006), 139% (from $166 to $397), and 84% (from $81 to $149), respectively. A 49% increase in the number of patients seeking spine-related care (from 12.2 million in 1997 to 18.2 million in 2006) was the largest contributing factor to increased outpatient expenditures. Population measures of mental health and work, social, and physical limitations worsened over time among people with spine problems.
CONCLUSION: Expenditure increases for spine-related inpatient, prescription, and emergency services were primarily the result of increasing per-user expenditures, while those related to outpatient visits were primarily due to an increase in the number of users of ambulatory services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19675510     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1fad1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  101 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic discography: what is the clinical utility?

Authors:  David A Provenzano
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  Gene therapy for the treatment of chronic peripheral nervous system pain.

Authors:  William F Goins; Justus B Cohen; Joseph C Glorioso
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  Medicare part B claims for chiropractic spinal manipulation, 1998 to 2004.

Authors:  James M Whedon; Matthew A Davis
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Nanoparticle fullerol alleviates radiculopathy via NLRP3 inflammasome and neuropeptides.

Authors:  Li Jin; Mengmeng Ding; Azra Oklopcic; Bayan Aghdasi; Li Xiao; Ziyi Li; Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic; Xudong Li
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 5.307

5.  Worsening trends in the management and treatment of back pain.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Ellen P McCarthy; Roger B Davis; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  Conservative spine care: opportunities to improve the quality and value of care.

Authors:  Thomas M Kosloff; David Elton; Stephanie A Shulman; Janice L Clarke; Alexis Skoufalos; Amanda Solis
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 7.  Advances in the diagnosis of degenerated lumbar discs and their possible clinical application.

Authors:  Marco Brayda-Bruno; Marta Tibiletti; Keita Ito; Jeremy Fairbank; Fabio Galbusera; Alberto Zerbi; Sally Roberts; Ellen Wachtel; Yulia Merkher; Sarit Sara Sivan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for low back pain targeting the low back only or low back plus hips: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Scott A Burns; Joshua A Cleland; Darren A Rivett; Suzanne J Snodgrass
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Nonsurgical Treatment Choices by Individuals with Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation in the United States: Associations with Long-term Outcomes.

Authors:  Anne Thackeray; Julie M Fritz; Jon D Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Management of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Joshua A Hirsch; Frank Je Falco; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.