BACKGROUND: Prior research indicates that successful weight-loss maintainers (SWLs) work harder than people of normal weight to maintain their weight loss, including greater dietary restriction of fat and higher physical activity levels. However, little work to date has examined how SWLs differ biologically from normal-weight (NW) and obese controls. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the brain responses of SWLs to food pictures with those of NW and obese controls. DESIGN: Blood oxygen level-dependent responses to high- and low-energy food pictures were measured in 18 NW controls, 16 obese controls, and 17 SWLs. RESULTS: Group differences were identified in 4 regions, which indicated significant change in activation in response to the food pictures. SWLs showed greater activation in the left superior frontal region and right middle temporal region than did NW and obese controls-a pattern of results confirmed in exploratory voxel-wise analyses. Obese controls also showed greater activation in a bilateral precentral region. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that SWLs show greater activation in frontal regions and primary and secondary visual cortices-a pattern consistent with greater inhibitory control in response to food cues and greater visual attention to the food cues. A greater engagement of inhibitory control regions in response to food cues as well as a greater monitoring of foods may promote control of food intake and successful weight-loss maintenance.
BACKGROUND: Prior research indicates that successful weight-loss maintainers (SWLs) work harder than people of normal weight to maintain their weight loss, including greater dietary restriction of fat and higher physical activity levels. However, little work to date has examined how SWLs differ biologically from normal-weight (NW) and obese controls. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the brain responses of SWLs to food pictures with those of NW and obese controls. DESIGN: Blood oxygen level-dependent responses to high- and low-energy food pictures were measured in 18 NW controls, 16 obese controls, and 17 SWLs. RESULTS: Group differences were identified in 4 regions, which indicated significant change in activation in response to the food pictures. SWLs showed greater activation in the left superior frontal region and right middle temporal region than did NW and obese controls-a pattern of results confirmed in exploratory voxel-wise analyses. Obese controls also showed greater activation in a bilateral precentral region. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that SWLs show greater activation in frontal regions and primary and secondary visual cortices-a pattern consistent with greater inhibitory control in response to food cues and greater visual attention to the food cues. A greater engagement of inhibitory control regions in response to food cues as well as a greater monitoring of foods may promote control of food intake and successful weight-loss maintenance.
Authors: William D S Killgore; Ashley D Young; Lisa A Femia; Piotr Bogorodzki; Jadwiga Rogowska; Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jason J Hassenstab; Lawrence H Sweet; Angelo Del Parigi; Jeanne M McCaffery; Andreana P Haley; Kathryn E Demos; Ronald A Cohen; Rena R Wing Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Kristina M Rapuano; Jeremy F Huckins; James D Sargent; Todd F Heatherton; William M Kelley Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 5.357