Literature DB >> 19675006

Shifting latitudinal clines in avian body size correlate with global warming in Australian passerines.

Janet L Gardner1, Robert Heinsohn, Leo Joseph.   

Abstract

Intraspecific latitudinal clines in the body size of terrestrial vertebrates, where members of the same species are larger at higher latitudes, are widely interpreted as evidence for natural selection and adaptation to local climate. These clines are predicted to shift in response to climate change. We used museum specimens to measure changes in the body size of eight passerine bird species from south-eastern Australia over approximately the last 100 years. Four species showed significant decreases in body size (1.8-3.6% of wing length) and a shift in latitudinal cline over that period, and a meta-analysis demonstrated a consistent trend across all eight species. Southern high-latitude populations now display the body sizes typical of more northern populations pre-1950, equivalent to a 7 degrees shift in latitude. Using ptilochronology, we found no evidence that these morphological changes were a plastic response to changes in nutrition, a likely non-genetic mechanism for the pattern observed. Our results demonstrate a generalized response by eight avian species to some major environmental change over the last 100 years or so, probably global warming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19675006      PMCID: PMC2817282          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly.

Authors:  R B Huey; G W Gilchrist; M L Carlson; D Berrigan; L Serra
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.

Authors:  Camille Parmesan; Gary Yohe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effects of forest patch size on physiological stress and immunocompetence in an area-sensitive passerine, the Eurasian treecreeper (Certhia familiaris): an experiment.

Authors:  Petri Suorsa; Heikki Helle; Vesa Koivunen; Esa Huhta; Ari Nikula; Harri Hakkarainen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Ecosystem consequences of bird declines.

Authors:  Cağan H Sekercioğlu; Gretchen C Daily; Paul R Ehrlich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Stepwise model fitting and statistical inference: turning noise into signal pollution.

Authors:  Roger Mundry; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Global biogeography and ecology of body size in birds.

Authors:  Valérie A Olson; Richard G Davies; C David L Orme; Gavin H Thomas; Shai Meiri; Tim M Blackburn; Kevin J Gaston; Ian P F Owens; Peter M Bennett
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  T J Dewitt; A Sih; D S Wilson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Global warming and body mass decline in Israeli passerine birds.

Authors:  Y Yom-Tov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Fat reserves and perceived predation risk in the great tit, Parus major.

Authors:  L K Gentle; A G Gosler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Nonlinear impact of climate on survival in a migratory white stork population.

Authors:  Marie Nevoux; Jean-Claude Barbraud; Christophe Barbraud
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  25 in total

1.  Leaf morphology shift linked to climate change.

Authors:  Greg R Guerin; Haixia Wen; Andrew J Lowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Michael W Holmes; Talisin T Hammond; Guinevere O U Wogan; Rachel E Walsh; Katie LaBarbera; Elizabeth A Wommack; Felipe M Martins; Jeremy C Crawford; Katya L Mack; Luke M Bloch; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 3.  Climate change and evolutionary adaptation.

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  No evidence that warmer temperatures are associated with selection for smaller body sizes.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Michael B Morrissey; Stephanie M Carlson; Clinton D Francis; Joel G Kingsolver; Kenneth D Whitney; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Marginal sinks or potential refuges? Costs and benefits for coral-obligate reef fishes at deep range margins.

Authors:  Chancey MacDonald; Geoffrey P Jones; Tom Bridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Climate change impacts on body size and food web structure on mountain ecosystems.

Authors:  Miguel Lurgi; Bernat C López; José M Montoya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Novel communities from climate change.

Authors:  Miguel Lurgi; Bernat C López; José M Montoya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Adaptation to climate change: contrasting patterns of thermal-reaction-norm evolution in Pacific versus Atlantic silversides.

Authors:  Hannes Baumann; David O Conover
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Tests of ecogeographical relationships in a non-native species: what rules avian morphology?

Authors:  Adam P A Cardilini; Katherine L Buchanan; Craig D H Sherman; Phillip Cassey; Matthew R E Symonds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Are latitudinal clines in body size adaptive?

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell
Journal:  Oikos       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.