Literature DB >> 19674681

Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade.

Bart N Green1, Claire D Johnson, Alan Adams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and discuss the process used to write a narrative review of the literature for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Publication of narrative overviews of the literature should be standardized to increase their objectivity.
BACKGROUND: In the past decade numerous changes in research methodology pertaining to reviews of the literature have occurred. These changes necessitate authors of review articles to be familiar with current standards in the publication process.
METHODS: Narrative overview of the literature synthesizing the findings of literature retrieved from searches of computerized databases, hand searches, and authoritative texts. DISCUSSION: An overview of the use of three types of reviews of the literature is presented. Step by step instructions for how to conduct and write a narrative overview utilizing a 'best-evidence synthesis' approach are discussed, starting with appropriate preparatory work and ending with how to create proper illustrations. Several resources for creating reviews of the literature are presented and a narrative overview critical appraisal worksheet is included. A bibliography of other useful reading is presented in an appendix.
CONCLUSION: Narrative overviews can be a valuable contribution to the literature if prepared properly. New and experienced authors wishing to write a narrative overview should find this article useful in constructing such a paper and carrying out the research process. It is hoped that this article will stimulate scholarly dialog amongst colleagues about this research design and other complex literature review methods.

Year:  2006        PMID: 19674681      PMCID: PMC2647067          DOI: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  13 in total

1.  Structured abstracts and the JMPT.

Authors:  D J Lawrence
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.

Authors:  A D Oxman; G H Guyatt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals.

Authors:  A R Jadad; D J Cook; A Jones; T P Klassen; P Tugwell; M Moher; D Moher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Guidelines for reading literature reviews.

Authors:  A D Oxman; G H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The medical review article: state of the science.

Authors:  C D Mulrow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  How to read clinical journals: I. why to read them and how to start reading them critically.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Critical appraisal of review articles.

Authors:  B G Hutchison
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Olkin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 9.  Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis.

Authors:  R E Slavin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 10.  Applying overviews and meta-analyses at the bedside.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  150 in total

Review 1.  Conceptualizing the Pathways and Processes Between Language Barriers and Health Disparities: Review, Synthesis, and Extension.

Authors:  Sachiko Terui
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-02

2.  How to write a review article?

Authors:  Ömer Gülpınar; Adil Güçal Güçlü
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-09

Review 3.  Factors Affecting Patients' Perception On, and Adherence To, Anticoagulant Therapy: Anticipating the Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Ekta Y Pandya; Beata Bajorek
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Reluctance to disclose difficult diagnoses: a narrative review comparing communication by psychiatrists and oncologists.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Confidentiality Matters but How Do We Improve Implementation in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Care?

Authors:  Sanjana Pampati; Nicole Liddon; Patricia J Dittus; Susan Hocevar Adkins; Riley J Steiner
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Writing an effective review article.

Authors:  Christine M Murphy
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-06

Review 7.  Whole-body vibration and occupational physical performance: a review.

Authors:  Robert Savage; Daniel Billing; Alistair Furnell; Kevin Netto; Brad Aisbett
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 8.  Towards environmental health equity in health impact assessment: innovations and opportunities.

Authors:  Chris G Buse; Valerie Lai; Katie Cornish; Margot W Parkes
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 9.  A narrative literature review to direct spinal cord injury patient education programming.

Authors:  Kim van Wyk; Amber Backwell; Andrea Townson
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015

Review 10.  Wrist Injuries in Tennis Players: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Max Stuelcken; Daniel Mellifont; Adam Gorman; Mark Sayers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.