Literature DB >> 19674307

The influence of distinct pollinators on female and male reproductive success in the Rocky Mountain columbine.

Johanne Brunet1, Karsten G A Holmquist.   

Abstract

Although there are many reasons to expect distinct pollinator types to differentially affect a plant's reproductive success, few studies have directly examined this question. Here, we contrast the impact of two kinds of pollinators on reproductive success via male and female functions in the Rocky Mountain columbine, Aquilegia coerulea. We set up pollinator exclusion treatments in each of three patches where Aquilegia plants were visited by either day pollinators (majority bumble bees), by evening pollinators (hawkmoths), or by both (control). Day pollinators collected pollen and groomed, whereas evening pollinators collected nectar but did not groom. Maternal parents, potential fathers and progeny arrays were genotyped at five microsatellite loci. We estimated female outcrossing rate and counted seeds to measure female reproductive success and used paternity analysis to determine male reproductive success. Our results document that bumble bees frequently moved pollen among patches of plants and that, unlike hawkmoths, pollen moved by bumble bees sired more outcrossed seeds when it remained within a patch as opposed to moving between patches. Pollinator type differentially affected the outcrossing rate but not seed set, the number of outcrossed seeds or overall male reproductive success. Multiple visits to a plant and more frequent visits by bumble bees could help to explain the lack of impact of pollinator type on overall reproductive success. The increase in selfing rate with hawkmoths likely resulted from the abundant pollen available in experimental flowers. Our findings highlighted a new type of pollinator interactions that can benefit a plant species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19674307     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04304.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of population genetic structures of the plant Silene stellata and its obligate pollinating seed predator moth Hadena ectypa.

Authors:  Juannan Zhou; Michele R Dudash; Elizabeth A Zimmer; Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Contemporary gene flow and mating system of Arabis alpina in a Central European alpine landscape.

Authors:  D Buehler; R Graf; R Holderegger; F Gugerli
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Variation in pollen-donor composition among pollinators in an entomophilous tree species, Castanea crenata, revealed by single-pollen genotyping.

Authors:  Yoichi Hasegawa; Yoshihisa Suyama; Kenji Seiwa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Specialist pollinators deplete pollen in the spring ephemeral wildflower Claytonia virginica.

Authors:  Alison J Parker; Neal M Williams; James D Thomson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Herbivory as an important selective force in the evolution of floral traits and pollinator shifts.

Authors:  Tania Jogesh; Rick P Overson; Robert A Raguso; Krissa A Skogen
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.276

6.  Linking the foraging behavior of three bee species to pollen dispersal and gene flow.

Authors:  Johanne Brunet; Yang Zhao; Murray K Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Gene flow in commercial alfalfa (Medicago sativa subsp. sativa L.) seed production fields: Distance is the primary but not the sole influence on adventitious presence.

Authors:  Sandya R Kesoju; Matthew Kramer; Johanne Brunet; Stephanie L Greene; Amelia Jordan; Ruth C Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Why honeybees are poor pollinators of a mass-flowering plant: Experimental support for the low pollen quality hypothesis.

Authors:  Carolina Diller; Miguel Castañeda-Zárate; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Influence of pollen transport dynamics on sire profiles and multiple paternity in flowering plants.

Authors:  Randall J Mitchell; William G Wilson; Karsten G Holmquist; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.