Literature DB >> 19674125

A non-randomised controlled trial of the Home Independence Program (HIP): an Australian restorative programme for older home-care clients.

Gill Lewin1, Suzanne Vandermeulen.   

Abstract

The Home Independence Program (HIP) is a short-term restorative programme targeted at older home-care clients, who do not have a diagnosis of dementia, when they are first referred for assistance or when they are referred for additional services because their needs have increased. This study compared the outcomes for individuals who participated in HIP with those of individuals who received 'usual' home-care services. The study was conducted in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia, between 2001 and 2003, when HIP was being trialled as a service in just one region. One hundred clients were recruited into each group and were visited at home on three occasions--service start and at 3 months and 1 year. Standardised outcome measures were used to measure functional dependency, morale, confidence in performing everyday activities without falling and functional mobility. Service outcomes were also examined at 3 months and 1 year. The HIP group showed improvements on all personal outcome measures compared with the control group. These improvements were, except for the morale scale, significantly associated with group assignment even when baseline differences between the groups were adjusted for. As regards service outcomes, the odds of the individuals who received HIP still requiring services was 0.07 (95% CI = 0.03-0.15, P < 0.001) times those for the individuals in the control group at 3 months and 0.14 times at 12 months (95% CI = 0.07-0.29, P < 0.001). The results of this study supported the hypothesis that older individuals referred for home care who participated in a programme to promote their independence had better individual and service outcomes than individuals who received usual home care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19674125     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00878.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  21 in total

Review 1.  Time-limited home-care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults.

Authors:  Andy Cochrane; Mairead Furlong; Sinead McGilloway; David W Molloy; Michael Stevenson; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-11

Review 2.  A systematic review of different models of home and community care services for older persons.

Authors:  Lee-Fay Low; Melvyn Yap; Henry Brodaty
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Study protocol for a multicenter investigation of reablement in Norway.

Authors:  Eva Langeland; Eva Langland; Hanne Tuntland; Oddvar Førland; Eline Aas; Bjarte Folkestad; Frode F Jacobsen; Ingvild Kjeken
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 4.  Interventions to reduce dependency in personal activities of daily living in community dwelling adults who use homecare services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Phillip J Whitehead; Esme J Worthington; Ruth H Parry; Marion F Walker; Avril E R Drummond
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  A feasibility study and pilot randomised trial of a tailored prevention program to reduce falls in older people with mild dementia.

Authors:  Jacqueline Wesson; Lindy Clemson; Henry Brodaty; Stephen Lord; Morag Taylor; Laura Gitlin; Jacqueline Close
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Evidence for the long term cost effectiveness of home care reablement programs.

Authors:  Gill F Lewin; Helman S Alfonso; Janine J Alan
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 7.  Effectiveness of Reablement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Annie Tessier; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Carrie Anna Mcginn; Renée Latulippe
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-05

8.  Effects of a home visiting nurse intervention versus care as usual on individual activities of daily living: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bruce Friedman; Yanen Li; Dianne V Liebel; Bethel A Powers
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Study protocol: translating and implementing psychosocial interventions in aged home care the lifestyle engagement activity program (LEAP) for life.

Authors:  Lee-Fay Low; Jess R Baker; Yun-Hee Jeon; Cameron Camp; Maggie Haertsch; Margaret Skropeta
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  A comparison of the home-care and healthcare service use and costs of older Australians randomised to receive a restorative or a conventional home-care service.

Authors:  Gill Lewin; Janine Allan; Candice Patterson; Matthew Knuiman; Duncan Boldy; Delia Hendrie
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2014-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.