Literature DB >> 19673920

The peri-implant sulcus compared with internal implant and suprastructure components: a microbiological analysis.

Jan Cosyn1, Louis Van Aelst, Bruno Collaert, G Rutger Persson, Hugo De Bruyn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A recent in vivo study has shown considerable contamination of internal implant and suprastructure components with great biodiversity, indicating bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface, abutment-prosthesis interface, and restorative margins. The goal of the present study was to compare microbiologically the peri-implant sulcus to these internal components on implants with no clinical signs of peri-implantitis and in function for many years. Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization was used to identify and quantify 40 species.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-eight turned titanium Brånemark implants in eight systemically healthy patients (seven women, one man) under regular supportive care were examined. All implants had been placed in the maxilla and loaded with a screw-retained full-arch bridge for an average of 9.6 years. Gingival fluid samples were collected from the deepest sulcus per implant for microbiological analysis. As all fixed restorations were removed, the cotton pellet enclosed in the intra-coronal compartment and the abutment screw were retrieved and microbiologically evaluated.
RESULTS: The pellet enclosed in the suprastructure was very similar to the peri-implant sulcus in terms of bacterial detection frequencies and levels for practically all the species included in the panel. Yet, there was virtually no microbial link between these compartments. When comparing the abutment screw to the peri-implant sulcus, the majority of the species were less frequently found, and in lower numbers at the former. However, a relevant link in counts for a lot of bacteria was described between these compartments. Even though all implants in the present study showed no clinical signs of peri-implantitis, the high prevalence of numerous species associated with pathology was striking.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-coronal compartments of screw-retained fixed restorations were heavily contaminated. The restorative margin may have been the principal pathway for bacterial leakage. Contamination of abutment screws most likely occurred from the peri-implant sulcus via the implant-abutment interface and abutment-prosthesis interface.
© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673920     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00220.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  11 in total

1.  Implant-abutment leaking of replace conical connection nobel biocare® implant system. An in vitro study of the microbiological penetration from external environment to implant-abutment space.

Authors:  E El Haddad; A B Giannì; G E Mancini; F Cura; F Carinci
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

2.  Analysis of the intraimplant microflora of two-piece dental implants.

Authors:  Sönke Harder; Rainer Podschun; Livia Grancicova; Christian Mehl; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A new system of implant abutment connection: how to improve a two piece implant system sealing.

Authors:  F Grecchi; M DI Girolamo; F Cura; V Candotto; F Carinci
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-11-30

4.  Leakage evaluation of original and compatible implant-abutment connections: In vitro study using Rhodamine B.

Authors:  Antoine Berberi; George Tehini; Khaldoun Rifai; Farah Bou Nasser Eddine; Bassam Badran; Haidar Akl
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2014-08-11

5.  In Vitro Evaluation of Bacterial Leakage at Implant-Abutment Connection: An 11-Degree Morse Taper Compared to a Butt Joint Connection.

Authors:  Hooman Khorshidi; Saeed Raoofi; Afagh Moattari; Atoosa Bagheri; Mohammad Hassan Kalantari
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2016-05-03

Review 6.  Microbial Profiles and Detection Techniques in Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Miguel Padial-Molina; Jesús López-Martínez; Francisco O'Valle; Pablo Galindo-Moreno
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

7.  A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating.

Authors:  Francesco Carinci; Dorina Lauritano; Carlo Alberto Bignozzi; Daniele Pazzi; Valentina Candotto; Paulo Santos de Oliveira; Antonio Scarano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  The Efficacy of a Diode Laser on Titanium Implants for the Reduction of Microorganisms That Cause Periimplantitis.

Authors:  Anna Wawrzyk; Michał Łobacz; Agnieszka Adamczuk; Weronika Sofińska-Chmiel; Mansur Rahnama
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Implant-Abutment Misfit after Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Experimental Study.

Authors:  John Eversong Lucena de Vasconcelos; Jefferson David Melo de Matos; Daher Antonio Queiroz; Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes; Bruna Caroline Gonçalves Vasconcelos de Lacerda; Marco Antonio Bottino; Cecilia Pedroso Turssi; Roberta Tarkany Basting; Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.748

10.  The Use of the Diode Laser against the Microbiome on Composites Closing the Screw Access Hall (Sah) in the Reconstruction of Dental Implants: Ex Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Anna Wawrzyk; Mansur Rahnama; Weronika Sofińska-Chmiel; Sławomir Wilczyński; Michał Łobacz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.