Literature DB >> 19672317

Religiosity and Fertility in the United States: The Role of Fertility Intentions.

Sarah R Hayford1, S Philip Morgan.   

Abstract

Using data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we show that women who report that religion is "very important" in their everyday life have both higher fertility and higher intended fertility than those saying religion is "somewhat important" or "not important." Factors such as unwanted fertility, age at childbearing, or degree of fertility postponement seem not to contribute to religiosity differentials in fertility. This answer prompts more fundamental questions: what is the nature of this greater "religiosity"? And why do the more religious want more children? We show that those saying religion is more important have more traditional gender and family attitudes and that these attitudinal differences account for a substantial part of the fertility differential. We speculate regarding other contributing causes.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19672317      PMCID: PMC2723861          DOI: 10.1353/sof.0.0000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Forces        ISSN: 0037-7732


  12 in total

1.  Birth wantedness reports: a look forward and a look back.

Authors:  L Williams; J Abma
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  2000 Fall-Winter

2.  Intended and Ideal Family Size in the United States, 1970-2002.

Authors:  Kellie J Hagewen; S Philip Morgan
Journal:  Popul Dev Rev       Date:  2005-09-01

3.  Religion and fertility in the United States: new patterns.

Authors:  W D Mosher; L B Williams; D P Johnson
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1992-05

4.  Patterns of contraceptive use in the United States: the importance of religious factors.

Authors:  C Goldscheider; W D Mosher
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr

5.  The end of "Catholic" fertility.

Authors:  C F Westoff; E F Jones
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1979-05

6.  The revolution in birth control practices of U.S. Roman Catholics.

Authors:  C F Westoff; L Bumpass
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Religion and fertility: a replication.

Authors:  W D Mosher; G E Hendershot
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1984-05

8.  National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation.

Authors:  James M Lepkowski; William D Mosher; Karen E Davis; Robert M Groves; John van Hoewyk; Jennifer Willem
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2006-07

9.  On the validity of retrospective assessments of pregnancy intention.

Authors:  Ted Joyce; Robert Kaestner; Sanders Korenman
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2002-02

10.  Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew D Bramlett; William D Mosher
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2002-07
View more
  49 in total

1.  China's Below-Replacement Fertility: Recent Trends and Future Prospects.

Authors:  S Philip Morgan; Guo Zhigang; Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  Popul Dev Rev       Date:  2009-09-09

2.  Responsive survey design, demographic data collection, and models of demographic behavior.

Authors:  William G Axinn; Cynthia F Link; Robert M Groves
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2011-08

3.  Lower use of sexual and reproductive health services among women with frequent religious participation, regardless of sexual experience.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Caroline Moreau; James Trussell
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  A Note on the Effect of Religiosity on Fertility.

Authors:  Dierk Herzer
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2019-06

5.  Pregnancy intentions among women who do not try: focusing on women who are okay either way.

Authors:  Julia McQuillan; Arthur L Greil; Karina M Shreffler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-02

6.  "Super Bowl Babies": Do Counties with Super Bowl Winning Teams Experience Increases in Births Nine Months Later?

Authors:  George M Hayward; Anna Rybińska
Journal:  Socius       Date:  2017-07-06

7.  Differential fertility makes society more conservative on family values.

Authors:  Tom S Vogl; Jeremy Freese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course.

Authors:  Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2009-11

9.  A Closer Look at the Second Demographic Transition in the U.S.: Evidence of Bidirectionality from a Cohort Perspective (1982-2006).

Authors:  Jennifer B Kane
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2012-10-04

Review 10.  Religious influences on the reproductive health decisions of HIV-positive Latinas on the border.

Authors:  Susan Instone; Mary-Rose Mueller
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2011-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.