Literature DB >> 19672206

Comparison of different pancreatic anastomosis techniques using the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery: a single surgeon's experience.

DongDo You1, KyungUk Jung, HyungGeun Lee, JinSeok Heo, SeongHo Choi, DongWook Choi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare different techniques using the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery for postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS: The perioperative data of 119 patients that underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis was performed using the dunking method (n = 39), the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis method (n = 40), and the duct-to-mucosa adaptation (n = 40).
RESULTS: The most frequent complication was postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF; grades A, 21%; B, 8%; and C, 3%), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH; grades B, 7% and C, 1%), and delayed gastric emptying (DGE; grades A, 1% and B, 6%). No significant differences in POPF were found between patients who underwent different types of pancreatic anastomoses. Only pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (P = 0.001) and pancreatic texture (P = 0.012) were potentially related to POPF. Patients with or without POPF grade A had shorter postoperative stays than patients with grade B or C POPF (P < 0.001), and similar findings were obtained for DGE and PPH.
CONCLUSIONS: The successful management of pancreatic anastomoses depends more on a meticulous surgical technique and appropriate experience rather than on the type of technique. Furthermore, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definitions of POPF, DGE, and PPH seem objective and universally acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19672206     DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181b365f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.327


  10 in total

1.  Pancreatico-duodenectomy and postoperative pancreatic fistula: risk factors and technical considerations in a specialized HPB center.

Authors:  Luciano De Carlis; Fabio Ferla; Stefano Di Sandro; Alessandro Giacomoni; Riccardo De Carlis; Raffaella Sguinzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-04-22

2.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): predictors and management from a prospective database.

Authors:  B Darnis; R Lebeau; X Chopin-Laly; M Adham
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Zhiyong Dong; Jing Xu; Zhen Wang; Maxim S Petrov
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-06

4.  Factors associated with delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Abhishek D Parmar; Kristin M Sheffield; Gabriela M Vargas; Henry A Pitt; E Molly Kilbane; Bruce L Hall; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Evaluation of a recently described risk classification scheme for pancreatic fistulae development after pancreaticoduodenectomy without routine post-operative drainage.

Authors:  John W Kunstman; Eric Kuo; Annabelle L Fonseca; Ronald R Salem
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Application of "papillary-like main pancreatic duct invaginated" pancreaticojejunostomy for normal soft pancreas cases.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Jin Xu; Chen Liu; Jiang Long; Liang Liu; Yongfeng Xu; Chuntao Wu; Guopei Luo; Quanxing Ni; Min Li; Xianjun Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Pancreatic Remnant Occlusion after Whipple's Procedure: An Alternative Oncologically Safe Method.

Authors:  Theodosios Theodosopoulos; Dionysios Dellaportas; Anneza I Yiallourou; George Gkiokas; George Polymeneas; Alexios Fotopoulos
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2013-08-05

8.  PANasta Trial; Cattell Warren versus Blumgart techniques of panreatico-jejunostomy following pancreato-duodenectomy: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Halloran; Kellie Platt; Abbie Gerard; Fotis Polydoros; Derek A O'Reilly; Dhanwant Gomez; Andrew Smith; John P Neoptolemos; Zahir Soonwalla; Mark Taylor; Jane M Blazeby; Paula Ghaneh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study of 126 patients.

Authors:  Xin Zhong; Xianfa Wang; Junhai Pan; Hepan Zhu; Lihu Gu; Zhaoqi Shi
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Selection of pancreaticojejunostomy technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy: duct-to-mucosa anastomosis is not better than invagination anastomosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunxiao Lyu; Ting Li; Bin Wang; Yunxiao Cheng; Sicong Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.