Literature DB >> 24833603

Evaluation of a recently described risk classification scheme for pancreatic fistulae development after pancreaticoduodenectomy without routine post-operative drainage.

John W Kunstman1, Eric Kuo, Annabelle L Fonseca, Ronald R Salem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) formation occurs frequently after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Recently, a 10-point Fistula Risk Score (FRS) evaluating the likelihood of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) development has been described and validated. This scheme has yet to be evaluated in PD patients managed without intra-operative drain placement.
METHODS: Among patients undergoing PD at an academic centre since 2003, a retrospective analysis calculating FRS and its correlation with CR-POPF development was evaluated by logistic regression. Secondary analysis examined presentation and management of CR-POPF in undrained PD patients.
RESULTS: FRS was calculated for 265 patients; 97.7% were managed without operative drains. The overall incidence of CR-POPF was 7.9%. Logistic regression revealed a 1.6-fold increase in CR-POPF risk per 1-point increase in FRS [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.0]. The negative predictive value in patients with FRS <3 was 100%, whereas the positive predictive value of FRS >6 was 16.7%. The median time to CR-POPF diagnosis was 18 days [interquartile range (IQR) 13-23]; 70.0% required readmission and 10.0% required a laparotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients without operative drainage, CR-POPF often has delayed presentations but most are managed non-operatively. The predictive value of high-risk FRS appears limited; conversely, a low-risk FRS accurately predicts the absence of CR-POPF and seems an appropriate metric for guiding care.
© 2014 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24833603      PMCID: PMC4487749          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  28 in total

1.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  M W Büchler; H Friess; M Wagner; C Kulli; V Wagener; K Z'Graggen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin C Miller; John D Christein; Stephen W Behrman; Jeffrey A Drebin; Wande B Pratt; Mark P Callery; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  K C Conlon; D Labow; D Leung; A Smith; W Jarnagin; D G Coit; N Merchant; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients.

Authors:  Fabrice Muscari; Bertrand Suc; Sylvain Kirzin; Jean-Marie Hay; Gilles Fourtanier; Abe Fingerhut; Bernard Sastre; Jacques Chipponi; Pierre-Louis Fagniez; Alexandre Radovanovic
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 8.  Complications of pancreatic cancer resection.

Authors:  C M Halloran; P Ghaneh; L Bosonnet; M N Hartley; R Sutton; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection; incidence, significance and management.

Authors:  Naoki Hashimoto; Chikao Yasuda; Harumasa Ohyanagi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

1.  Is it time to standardize patient factors for HPB surgery?

Authors:  Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: A systematic review.

Authors:  Filip Čečka; Martin Loveček; Bohumil Jon; Pavel Skalický; Zdeněk Šubrt; Čestmír Neoral; Alexander Ferko
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abigail E Vallance; Alastair L Young; Christian Macutkiewicz; Keith J Roberts; Andrew M Smith
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.647

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.