Literature DB >> 19671877

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study comparing the tolerability and efficacy of ipilimumab administered with or without prophylactic budesonide in patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma.

Jeffrey Weber1, John A Thompson, Omid Hamid, David Minor, Asim Amin, Ilan Ron, Ruggero Ridolfi, Hazem Assi, Anthony Maraveyas, David Berman, Jonathan Siegel, Steven J O'Day.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diarrhea (with or without colitis) is an immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with ipilimumab. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational phase II trial was conducted to determine whether prophylactic budesonide (Entocort EC), a nonabsorbed oral steroid, reduced the rate of grade >or=2 diarrhea in ipilimumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Previously treated and treatment-naïve patients (N = 115) with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma received open-label ipilimumab (10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses) with daily blinded budesonide (group A) or placebo (group B) through week 16. The first scheduled tumor evaluation was at week 12; eligible patients received maintenance treatment starting at week 24. Diarrhea was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 3.0. Patients kept a diary describing their bowel habits.
RESULTS: Budesonide did not affect the rate of grade >or=2 diarrhea, which occurred in 32.7% and 35.0% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. There were no bowel perforations or treatment-related deaths. Best overall response rates were 12.1% in group A and 15.8% in group B, with a median overall survival of 17.7 and 19.3 months, respectively. Within each group, the disease control rate was higher in patients with grade 3 to 4 irAEs than in patients with grade 0 to 2 irAEs, although many patients with grade 1 to 2 irAEs experienced clinical benefit. Novel patterns of response to ipilimumab were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab shows activity in advanced melanoma, with encouraging survival and manageable adverse events. Budesonide should not be used prophylactically for grade >or=2 diarrhea associated with ipilimumab therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19671877     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  213 in total

1.  Integrated NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses correlate with clinical benefit in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab.

Authors:  Jianda Yuan; Matthew Adamow; Brian A Ginsberg; Teresa S Rasalan; Erika Ritter; Humilidad F Gallardo; Yinyan Xu; Evelina Pogoriler; Stephanie L Terzulli; Deborah Kuk; Katherine S Panageas; Gerd Ritter; Mario Sznol; Ruth Halaban; Achim A Jungbluth; James P Allison; Lloyd J Old; Jedd D Wolchok; Sacha Gnjatic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 as a new therapeutic approach for advanced melanoma.

Authors:  Xiang-Yang Wang; Daming Zuo; Devanand Sarkar; Paul B Fisher
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 3.  Therapeutic cancer vaccines: are we there yet?

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Nicolas Acquavella; Zhiya Yu; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 4.  Have we overestimated the benefit of human(ized) antibodies?

Authors:  Daniel R Getts; Meghann T Getts; Derrick P McCarthy; Emily M L Chastain; Stephen D Miller
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 5.  Anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy: immune monitoring during clinical development of a novel immunotherapy.

Authors:  Margaret K Callahan; Jedd D Wolchok; James P Allison
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Immunologic response to xenogeneic gp100 DNA in melanoma patients: comparison of particle-mediated epidermal delivery with intramuscular injection.

Authors:  Brian A Ginsberg; Humilidad F Gallardo; Teresa S Rasalan; Matthew Adamow; Zhenyu Mu; Sapna Tandon; Barrett B Bewkes; Ruth-Ann Roman; Paul B Chapman; Gary K Schwartz; Richard D Carvajal; Katherine S Panageas; Stephanie L Terzulli; Alan N Houghton; Jianda D Yuan; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Latest advances in chemotherapeutic, targeted, and immune approaches in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Darshil J Shah; Roxana S Dronca
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab: long-term follow-up of 177 patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Peter A Prieto; James C Yang; Richard M Sherry; Marybeth S Hughes; Udai S Kammula; Donald E White; Catherine L Levy; Steven A Rosenberg; Giao Q Phan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Pooled Analysis of Long-Term Survival Data From Phase II and Phase III Trials of Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Dirk Schadendorf; F Stephen Hodi; Caroline Robert; Jeffrey S Weber; Kim Margolin; Omid Hamid; Debra Patt; Tai-Tsang Chen; David M Berman; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Concurrent radiotherapy and ipilimumab immunotherapy for patients with melanoma.

Authors:  Christopher A Barker; Michael A Postow; Shaheer A Khan; Kathryn Beal; Preeti K Parhar; Yoshiya Yamada; Nancy Y Lee; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 11.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.