PURPOSE: Finding markers or gene sets that would further classify patients into different risk categories and thus allow more individually adapted multimodality treatment regimens in soft tissue sarcomas is necessary. In this study, we investigated the prognostic values of hypoxia-inducible factor 1a (HIF1a), heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and other angiogenesis-related gene expressions, as well as their interrelationships. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were obtained from 45 patients with soft tissue sarcoma (median age 57 years, range 16-85 years). After laser capture microdissection direct quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (TaqMan) assays were done in triplicates to determine HIF1a, HB-EGF, VEGF, and other gene expression levels. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox [corrected] regression analysis revealed significant independent associations of HB-EGF, HIF1a, and VEGF-C gene expression to the overall survival (P < 0.0001). A combined factor of these three genes showed a relative risk for shorter survival of 5.5, more than twice higher as in an increasing International Union against Cancer Stage. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a significant sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 82% of this factor for the diagnosis of short (<3 years) versus long (3-9 years) survival (P = 0.0002). VEGF-A showed significant gender differences in the association to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring HIF1a, HB-EGF, and VEGF-C expression may contribute to a better understanding of the prognosis of patients with soft tissue sarcoma and may even play a crucial role for the distribution of patients to multimodal therapeutic regimens. Prospective studies investigating the response to different adjuvant or palliative therapies seem to be warranted.
PURPOSE: Finding markers or gene sets that would further classify patients into different risk categories and thus allow more individually adapted multimodality treatment regimens in soft tissue sarcomas is necessary. In this study, we investigated the prognostic values of hypoxia-inducible factor 1a (HIF1a), heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and other angiogenesis-related gene expressions, as well as their interrelationships. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were obtained from 45 patients with soft tissue sarcoma (median age 57 years, range 16-85 years). After laser capture microdissection direct quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (TaqMan) assays were done in triplicates to determine HIF1a, HB-EGF, VEGF, and other gene expression levels. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox [corrected] regression analysis revealed significant independent associations of HB-EGF, HIF1a, and VEGF-C gene expression to the overall survival (P < 0.0001). A combined factor of these three genes showed a relative risk for shorter survival of 5.5, more than twice higher as in an increasing International Union against Cancer Stage. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a significant sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 82% of this factor for the diagnosis of short (<3 years) versus long (3-9 years) survival (P = 0.0002). VEGF-A showed significant gender differences in the association to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring HIF1a, HB-EGF, and VEGF-C expression may contribute to a better understanding of the prognosis of patients with soft tissue sarcoma and may even play a crucial role for the distribution of patients to multimodal therapeutic regimens. Prospective studies investigating the response to different adjuvant or palliative therapies seem to be warranted.
Authors: Andreas-Claudius Hoffmann; Peter Wild; Christina Leicht; Simone Bertz; Kathleen D Danenberg; Peter V Danenberg; Robert Stöhr; Michael Stöckle; Jan Lehmann; Martin Schuler; Arndt Hartmann Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Ivonne Nel; Hideo A Baba; Judith Ertle; Frank Weber; Barbara Sitek; Martin Eisenacher; Helmut E Meyer; Joerg F Schlaak; Andreas-Claudius Hoffmann Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Avinash Kambadakone; Sam S Yoon; Tae-Min Kim; Daniel L Karl; Dan G Duda; Thomas F DeLaney; Dushyant V Sahani Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Hae-June Lee; Changhwan Yoon; Do Joong Park; Yeo-Jung Kim; Benjamin Schmidt; Yoon-Jin Lee; William D Tap; T S Karin Eisinger-Mathason; Edwin Choy; David G Kirsch; M Celeste Simon; Sam S Yoon Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Philip Wong; Peter Houghton; David G Kirsch; Steven E Finkelstein; Arta M Monjazeb; Meng Xu-Welliver; Adam P Dicker; Mansoor Ahmed; Bhadrasain Vikram; Beverly A Teicher; C Norman Coleman; Mitchell Machtay; Walter J Curran; Dian Wang Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Idoia Garcia; Gemma Mayol; José Ríos; Gema Domenech; Nai-Kong V Cheung; André Oberthuer; Matthias Fischer; John M Maris; Garrett M Brodeur; Barbara Hero; Eva Rodríguez; Mariona Suñol; Patricia Galvan; Carmen de Torres; Jaume Mora; Cinzia Lavarino Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-02-10 Impact factor: 12.531