OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the correlation between the mean change in disease activity and the mean change in synovial sublining (sl) CD68 expression could be demonstrated across different academic centers. METHODS: Synovial biopsies obtained at arthroscopy from patients with rheumatoid arthritis before and 160 days after rituximab therapy were selected and coded. Paired sections were processed independently at Amsterdam Medical Center (AMC) and at St. Vincent's University Hospital (SVUH), Dublin. Digital image analysis (DIA) was employed at both centers to quantify sublining CD68 expression. RESULTS: After analysis of CD68sl expression at centers in 2 different countries, high levels of intracenter and intercenter agreement were observed. For the pooled sections stained at AMC, the correlation between 2 investigators was R = 0.942, p = 0.000, and for sections stained at SVUH, R = 0.899, p = 0.001. Similarly, the intracenter correlations for DeltaCD68sl expression after treatment were R = 0.998, p = 0.000, for sections stained at AMC and R = 0.880, p = 0.000, for sections stained at SVUH. The intercenter correlation for the pooled scores of sections stained at AMC was R = 0.85, p = 0.000, and for the sections stained at SVUH, R = 0.62, p = 0.001. The consistent correlation between DeltaDAS (Disease Activity Score) and DeltaCD68sl expression across different studies (Pearson correlation = 0.895, p < 0.001) was confirmed. The standardized response mean values for DeltaCD68sl, calculated from analyses at both AMC and SVUH, were consistently 0.5 or greater, indicating a moderate to high potential to detect change. CONCLUSION: The correlation between mean DeltaDAS and mean DeltaCD68sl expression was confirmed across 2 centers. Examination of serial biopsy samples can be used reliably to screen for interesting biological effects at the site of inflammation at an early stage of drug development.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the correlation between the mean change in disease activity and the mean change in synovial sublining (sl) CD68 expression could be demonstrated across different academic centers. METHODS: Synovial biopsies obtained at arthroscopy from patients with rheumatoid arthritis before and 160 days after rituximab therapy were selected and coded. Paired sections were processed independently at Amsterdam Medical Center (AMC) and at St. Vincent's University Hospital (SVUH), Dublin. Digital image analysis (DIA) was employed at both centers to quantify sublining CD68 expression. RESULTS: After analysis of CD68sl expression at centers in 2 different countries, high levels of intracenter and intercenter agreement were observed. For the pooled sections stained at AMC, the correlation between 2 investigators was R = 0.942, p = 0.000, and for sections stained at SVUH, R = 0.899, p = 0.001. Similarly, the intracenter correlations for DeltaCD68sl expression after treatment were R = 0.998, p = 0.000, for sections stained at AMC and R = 0.880, p = 0.000, for sections stained at SVUH. The intercenter correlation for the pooled scores of sections stained at AMC was R = 0.85, p = 0.000, and for the sections stained at SVUH, R = 0.62, p = 0.001. The consistent correlation between DeltaDAS (Disease Activity Score) and DeltaCD68sl expression across different studies (Pearson correlation = 0.895, p < 0.001) was confirmed. The standardized response mean values for DeltaCD68sl, calculated from analyses at both AMC and SVUH, were consistently 0.5 or greater, indicating a moderate to high potential to detect change. CONCLUSION: The correlation between mean DeltaDAS and mean DeltaCD68sl expression was confirmed across 2 centers. Examination of serial biopsy samples can be used reliably to screen for interesting biological effects at the site of inflammation at an early stage of drug development.
Authors: Carl Orr; Elsa Vieira-Sousa; David L Boyle; Maya H Buch; Christopher D Buckley; Juan D Cañete; Anca I Catrina; Ernest H S Choy; Paul Emery; Ursula Fearon; Andrew Filer; Danielle Gerlag; Frances Humby; John D Isaacs; Søren A Just; Bernard R Lauwerys; Benoit Le Goff; Antonio Manzo; Trudy McGarry; Iain B McInnes; Aurélie Najm; Constantino Pitzalis; Arthur Pratt; Malcolm Smith; Paul P Tak; Rogier Thurlings; João E Fonseca; Douglas J Veale; Sander W Tas Journal: Nat Rev Rheumatol Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 20.543
Authors: Stefan Vordenbäumen; Christoph Schleich; Tim Lögters; Philipp Sewerin; Ellen Bleck; Thomas Pauly; Anja Müller-Lutz; Gerald Antoch; Matthias Schneider; Falk Miese; Benedikt Ostendorf Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: C T Ng; M Biniecka; A Kennedy; J McCormick; O Fitzgerald; B Bresnihan; D Buggy; C T Taylor; J O'Sullivan; U Fearon; D J Veale Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Qi-Quan Huang; Robert Birkett; Renee Doyle; Bo Shi; Elyssa L Roberts; Qinwen Mao; Richard M Pope Journal: J Immunol Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: L R Coulthard; J Geiler; R J Mathews; L D Church; L J Dickie; D L Cooper; C Wong; S Savic; D Bryer; M H Buch; P Emery; A W Morgan; M F McDermott Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.330