Literature DB >> 19669845

Does femoral component loosening predispose to femoral fracture?: an in vitro comparison of cemented hips.

Barton Harris1, John R Owen, Jennifer S Wayne, William A Jiranek.   

Abstract

The incidence of femur fracture around total hip arthroplasties continues to increase at substantial cost to society. These fractures are frequently associated with a loose femoral component. Consequently, we sought to test whether femoral component loosening predisposes to periprosthetic femoral fracture. Because many periprosthetic femoral fractures are spiral in nature, we evaluated the torsional characteristics of the implanted femur in which the only design variable was instability of the femoral component. We used synthetic (polyurethane) (n = 15) and paired cadaveric femora (n = 10) with specimens divided into two groups: well-fixed and loose cemented stems. Each specimen was tested mechanically in internal rotation until failure. For the synthetic specimens, torque to failure was reduced by 38%, whereas stiffness was decreased 54% for the loose group compared with the well-fixed group. For the cadaveric specimens, torque to failure was reduced by 58%, whereas stiffness decreased 70% for the loose group compared with the well-fixed group. Fracture patterns were similar between synthetic and cadaveric femora with a proximal spiral pattern in loose specimens and more distal fracture patterns with well-fixed stems. Based on our data, patients with loosened femoral components are at risk for fracture at a substantially lower torque than those with well-fixed components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19669845      PMCID: PMC2806997          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1034-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  32 in total

1.  Specific features associated with femoral shaft fractures caused by low-energy trauma.

Authors:  S Salminen; H Pihlajamäki; V Avikainen; A Kyrö; O Böstman
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1997-07

2.  Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Göran Garellick; Hans Regnér; Peter Herberts; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Detecting stem debonding in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian J McGrory; Paul Evans; Gavan Duffy
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2005-08

4.  Periprosthetic fractures: a problem on the rise.

Authors:  Allan E Gross
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  The natural history of debonding of the femoral component from the cement and its effect on long-term survival of Charnley total hip replacements.

Authors:  D J Berry; W S Harmsen; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date.

Authors:  D G Lewallen; D J Berry
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1998

7.  Cost-effectiveness of early surgical intervention in silent osteolysis.

Authors:  C J Lavernia
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Cement debonding process of total hip arthroplasty stems.

Authors:  N Verdonschot; R Huiskes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Nonunion after periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Crockarell; D J Berry; D G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures : modern plate osteosynthesis procedures].

Authors:  M J Raschke; R Stange; C Kösters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures : modern plate osteosynthesis procedures].

Authors:  M J Raschke; R Stange; C Kösters
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Periprosthetic fractures: concepts of biomechanical in vitro investigations.

Authors:  Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Treatment of periprosthetic fractures : new concepts in operative treatment].

Authors:  D Wähnert; B Schliemann; M J Raschke; C Kösters
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Loosely implanted cementless stems may become rotationally stable after loading.

Authors:  Arun Kannan; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; William A Jiranek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Implant survival of cemented arthroplasty following failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures in patients aged 30-60 years: a retrospective study with a median follow-up of 10 years.

Authors:  Mingliang Yu; Minji Yu; Yaodong Zhang; Huihui Cheng; Xianshang Zeng; Si Li; Weiguang Yu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Incidence of and risk factors for femoral fractures in the gap between hip and knee implants.

Authors:  José Antonio Valle Cruz; Antonio Luis Urda; Laura Serrano; Francisco Alberto Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Julio Otero; Enrique Moro; Luis López-Durán
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem: overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  Andrew N Fleischman; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

Review 10.  [Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum and femur : Causes-classification-treatment algorithms].

Authors:  D M Ates; P Koenen; R Otchwemah; H Bäthis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.