Literature DB >> 19669385

The John Insall Award: Both morphotype and gender influence the shape of the knee in patients undergoing TKA.

Johan Bellemans1, Karel Carpentier, Hilde Vandenneucker, Johan Vanlauwe, Jan Victor.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: There is an ongoing debate whether gender differences in the dimensions of the knee should influence the design of TKA components. We hypothesized that not only gender but also the patient's morphotype determined the shape of the distal femur and proximal tibia and that this factor should be taken into account when designing gender-specific TKA implants. We reviewed all 1000 European white patients undergoing TKA between April 2003 and June 2007 and stratified each into one of three groups based on their anatomic constitution: endomorph, ectomorph, or mesomorph. Of the 250 smallest knees, 98% were female, whereas 81% of the 250 largest knees were male. In the group with intermediate-sized knees, female knees were narrower than male knees. Patients with smaller knees (predominantly female) demonstrated large variability between narrow and wide mediolateral dimensions irrespective of gender. The same was true for larger knees (predominantly male). This variability within gender could partially be explained by morphotypic variation. Patients with short and wide morphotype (endomorph) had, irrespective of gender, wider knees, whereas patients with long and narrow morphotype (ectomorph) had narrower knees. The shape of the knee is therefore not only dependent on gender, but also on the morphotype of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19669385      PMCID: PMC2795809          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1016-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants.

Authors:  Wei-Pin Ho; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Jiann-Jong Liau
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Relationship of body composition to somatotype.

Authors:  M H Slaughter; T G Lohman
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Comparisons of physical characteristics and performances among female collegiate rowers.

Authors:  Rebecca A Battista; James M Pivarnik; Gail M Dummer; Norm Sauer; Robert M Malina
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  The female knee: anatomic variations.

Authors:  Sheryl Conley; Aaron Rosenberg; Roy Crowninshield
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  The somatotype, the morphophenotype and the morphogenotype.

Authors:  W H SHELDON
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1950

Review 6.  Current concepts review: symmetry versus asymmetry in the design of total knee femoral components--an unresolved controversy.

Authors:  D F Bindelglass; L D Dorr
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The influence of somatotype on anthropometric prediction of body composition in young women.

Authors:  R Bulbulian
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  A comparison of somatotype methods.

Authors:  B H Heath; J E Carter
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Distal femur morphometry: a gender and bilateral comparative study using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Khalil Awadh Murshed; Aynur Emine Ciçekcibaşi; Aydin Karabacakoğlu; Muzaffer Seker; Taner Ziylan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference?

Authors:  William P Barrett
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  42 in total

1.  Anthropometric difference of the knee on MRI according to gender and age groups.

Authors:  Hyuksoo Han; Sohee Oh; Chong Bum Chang; Seung-Baik Kang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Semi-automated landmark-based 3D analysis reveals new morphometric characteristics in the trochlear dysplastic femur.

Authors:  Annemieke Van Haver; Karel De Roo; Matthieu De Beule; Sofie Van Cauter; Emmanuel Audenaert; Tom Claessens; Peter Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Mechanical and kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marco Schiraldi; Giancarlo Bonzanini; Danilo Chirillo; Vito de Tullio
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

4.  Anatomy of the proximal femur at the time of total hip arthroplasty is a matter of morphotype and etiology but not gender.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Sebastien Parratte; Thomas Le Corroller; Thomas Lecorroller; Andrea Reggiori; Pierre Champsaur; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Linked Anatomic Kinematic Arthroplasty: A Unique Approach to Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seth Stake; Safa C Fassihi; Alex Gu; James Burns; George Thomas; Evan H Argintar; Kamran Sadr
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-14

6.  Morphometric evaluation of the knee in Chinese population reveals sexual dimorphism and age-related differences.

Authors:  Ke Li; Etienne Cavaignac; Wei Xu; Qiang Cheng; Nobert Telmon; Wei Huang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; William Colyn; Hilde Vandenneucker; Jan Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Do we need gender-specific total joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Christopher R Costa; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Evaluation of the 3-dimensional, weight-bearing orientation of the normal adult knee.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Ritesh R Shah; Ryan M Nunley; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Gender differences in the morphology of the trochlea and the distal femur.

Authors:  V Pinskerova; K Nemec; I Landor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.