Literature DB >> 19669129

Execution-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during action observation.

Masanori Sakamoto1, Tetsuro Muraoka, Nobuaki Mizuguchi, Kazuyuki Kanosue.   

Abstract

Excitability of the corticospinal pathway increased during observation of an action. The present study investigated whether corticospinal excitability during an action observation is modulated by physical movement executed by the observers themselves. Participants alternately repeated the observation of a pinching action with the thumb and index finger and execution (30 times) of the same action. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle during observation of the action. MEP amplitude gradually increased with the number of executions of the same action. However, MEP amplitude did not change when the participants only repeated observation of the pinching action or when the participants alternately repeated observation of the pinching action and execution of the isometric abduction of the index finger. These findings suggest that enhancement of cotricospinal excitability is dependent on the execution of a particular action that is very similar to the observed action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19669129     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1962-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Time-varying changes in corticospinal excitability accompanying the triphasic EMG pattern in humans.

Authors:  C D MacKinnon; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation.

Authors:  M Gangitano; F M Mottaghy; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Macaque ventral premotor cortex exerts powerful facilitation of motor cortex outputs to upper limb motoneurons.

Authors:  H Shimazu; M A Maier; G Cerri; P A Kirkwood; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Dexterous finger movements in primate without monosynaptic corticomotoneuronal excitation.

Authors:  Shigeto Sasaki; Tadashi Isa; Lars-Gunnar Pettersson; Bror Alstermark; Kimisato Naito; Kazuya Yoshimura; Kazuhiko Seki; Yukari Ohki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mapping implied body actions in the human motor system.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Valentina Moro; Matteo Candidi; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1986-11-11       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Post-exercise depression of motor evoked potentials as a function of exercise duration.

Authors:  A Samii; E M Wassermann; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-10

10.  Postexercise depression of motor evoked potentials: a measure of central nervous system fatigue.

Authors:  J P Brasil-Neto; A Pascual-Leone; J Valls-Solé; A Cammarota; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Video augmented mirror therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hyunjin Kim; Junghyun Kim; Sungbae Jo; Kyeongjin Lee; Junesun Kim; Changho Song
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 6.682

2.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability during acquisition of action sequences by observation.

Authors:  Masanori Sakamoto; Noriyoshi Moriyama; Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Tetsuro Muraoka; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Facilitation of corticospinal excitability according to motor imagery and mirror therapy in healthy subjects and stroke patients.

Authors:  Youn Joo Kang; Jeonghun Ku; Hyun Jung Kim; Hae Kyung Park
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-12-30

4.  The effects of action observation training and mirror therapy on gait and balance in stroke patients.

Authors:  Ho Jeong Lee; Young Mi Kim; Dong Kyu Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-03-22

5.  Comparison of the on-line effects of different motor simulation conditions on corticospinal excitability in healthy participants.

Authors:  C Pfenninger; S Grosprêtre; A Remontet; T Lapole
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.