Literature DB >> 19668787

Effect of operator and institutional volume on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions performed in Canada and the United States: a brief report from the Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy (ESPRIT) study.

Mina Madan1, Janarthan Nikhil, Anne S Hellkamp, Karen S Pieper, Marino Labinaz, E A Cohen, Christopher E Buller, Warren J Cantor, Peter Seidelin, John Ducas, Ronald G Carere, Madhu K Natarajan, J Conor O'Shea, James E Tcheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy (ESPRIT) trial compared the use of eptifibatide with placebo in 2064 coronary intervention patients. It was previously reported that Canadian patients had reduced rates of 30-day and one-year death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization (TVR) compared with patients in the United States (US).
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether operator or institutional volume differences explain the regional variation in clinical outcome. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Each site received an operator and institutional volume survey. Fifty-seven sites (62%) returned complete data on 1338 patients. In this smaller cohort, Canadian patients had reduced rates of 30-day and one-year death, MI or TVR compared with US patients (6.3% versus 10.3% and 14.9% versus 20.1%, respectively; P<0.05 for both comparisons). Among 176 physicians with a median of 13 years experience, the median operator volume was 200 cases per year. Operators with fewer than 100 cases per year had higher rates of 30-day death, MI or TVR (13.2% versus 8.7%; P=0.18) and large MI (7.7% versus 3.3%; P=0.06) than those with 100 or more cases per year. The median institutional volume was 1064 cases per year. Canadian and US centres had similar operator and institutional volumes. By multivariate modelling, operator volume was not predictive of adverse clinical events. However, the rates of 30-day and one-year death, MI or TVR fell by 3% for every 100 patients treated by the institution (OR 0.97; P=0.058 and P=0.002, respectively). Enrollment in Canada was associated with improved outcomes at 30 days (OR 0.50; P=0.001) and one year (OR 0.66; P=0.001) despite inclusion of volume variables in the models.
CONCLUSIONS: In the ESPRIT study, institutional volume was associated with a modest reduction in risk of death, MI or TVR over short- and long-term follow-up periods. The Canadian and US investigators and institutions selected in ESPRIT had similar annual procedural volumes. Therefore, volume variables did not explain the differential risk of clinical events observed for patients enrolled in the two countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19668787      PMCID: PMC2732380          DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70120-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  10 in total

1.  Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).

Authors:  Sidney C Smith; Ted E Feldman; John W Hirshfeld; Alice K Jacobs; Morton J Kern; Spencer B King; Douglass A Morrison; William W O'neill; Hartzell V Schaff; Patrick L Whitlow; David O Williams; Elliott M Antman; Sidney C Smith; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon Ann Hunt; Alice K Jacobs; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Volume-outcome relationships for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Chuntao Wu; Gary Walford; Spencer B King; David R Holmes; John A Ambrose; Samin Sharma; Stanley Katz; Luther T Clark; Robert H Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Do operator volumes relate to clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in the Canadian health care system?

Authors:  Warren J Cantor; Ruth Hall; Jack V Tu
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Operator volume and outcomes in 12,998 percutaneous coronary interventions. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

Authors:  P D McGrath; D E Wennberg; D J Malenka; M A Kellett; T J Ryan; J R O'Meara; W A Bradley; M J Hearne; B Hettleman; J F Robb; S Shubrooks; P VerLee; M W Watkins; F L Lucas; G T O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Volume-outcome relation for physicians and hospitals performing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in New York state.

Authors:  B A Vakili; R Kaplan; D L Brown
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality.

Authors:  J G Jollis; E D Peterson; E R DeLong; D B Mark; S R Collins; L H Muhlbaier; D B Pryor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists.

Authors:  E L Hannan; M Racz; T J Ryan; B D McCallister; L W Johnson; D T Arani; A D Guerci; J Sosa; E J Topol
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A comparison of clinical outcomes between Canadian and American patients after nonurgent coronary stenting.

Authors:  Mina Madan; Marino Labinaz; Eric A Cohen; Christopher E Buller; Warren J Cantor; Peter Seidelin; John Ducas; Ronald G Carere; Madhu K Natarajan; Karen S Pieper; Gail E Hafley; J Conor O'Shea; Michael M Kitt; Robert M Califf; James E Tcheng
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  The relationship between coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications.

Authors:  S E Kimmel; J A Berlin; W K Laskey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-10-11       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes.

Authors:  Apurva O Badheka; Sidakpal S Panaich; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J Patel; Chirag Savani; Abhishek Deshmukh; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Pearl Zakroysky; Daniel Wojdyla; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Matthew W Sherwood; Matthew T Roe; Tracy Y Wang; Eric D Peterson; Hitinder S Gurm; Mauricio G Cohen; John C Messenger; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Should geographic analyses guide the creation of regionalized care models for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Mikiko Terashima; Andrew Travers
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2010-02-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.