| Literature DB >> 19668583 |
Kayo Nakamura1, Masao Ota, Akira Meguro, Naoko Nomura, Kenji Kashiwagi, Fumihiko Mabuchi, Hiroyuki Iijima, Kazuhide Kawase, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Makoto Nakamura, Akira Negi, Takeshi Sagara, Teruo Nishida, Masaru Inatani, Hidenobu Tanihara, Makoto Aihara, Makoto Araie, Takeo Fukuchi, Haruki Abe, Tomomi Higashide, Kazuhisa Sugiyama, Takashi Kanamoto, Yoshiaki Kiuchi, Aiko Iwase, Shigeaki Ohno, Hidetoshi Inoko, Nobuhisa Mizuki.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the GPDS1 locus, a potential causative locus of pigment-dispersion syndrome, is associated with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) in Japanese patients.Entities:
Keywords: DPP6; GPDS1; glaucoma-related pigment dispersion syndrome; microsatellite; normal tension glaucoma
Year: 2009 PMID: 19668583 PMCID: PMC2708999 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s5132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Figure 1Location of 20 microsatellite markers used in this study and the genes around the GPDS1 locus. Display of genes and chromosome seven results in the UCSC genome browser on Human Mar. 2006 Assembly at chr7: 151,120,000–158,120,000.
Primers used in polymerase chain reaction for amplification of microsatellite markers in this study
| D7S0954i | F (NED) | 5′TTACATAAGGTACTTTCTGGTCAT3′ |
| R | 5′TGGTCTCCAGCTACATCAG3′ | |
| D7S0947i | F (NED) | 5′CTACTTTCCTGGTGTCTAGCTT3′ |
| R | 5′GATAACAGCTGATAGGTAGATCAG3′ | |
| D7S798 | F (VIC) | 5′AGCTGCAAAATAGTGGAAGTAG3′ |
| R | 5′CATCAATTCACATAATGACCG3′ | |
| D7S1829 | F (VIC) | 5′GGGGGTTTCAGAAGAGATGT3′ |
| R | 5′CCTCCAAAATTTCTGAGCAA3′ | |
| D7S2462 | F (FAM) | 5′GCCAAGATTGCACCACTAC3′ |
| R | 5′TGTTAAAAGTTCCCCAAGC3′ | |
| D7S0585i | F (NED) | 5′AATGAGCATTCTCAGTTTGAATAC3′ |
| R | 5′ATCTGGTGAACGAGTAAATAACAC3′ | |
| D7S2546 | F (FAM) | 5′GGAGGTTGAACAACTCTGAATAC3′ |
| R | 5′CACGCCAGGGTCTATCTT3′ | |
| D7S2447 | F (NED) | 5′GTCAGATGTAGGAACCAAGC3′ |
| R | 5′TCTCACTGTACTCAGCCTGT3′ | |
| Z67544 | F (VIC) | 5′CAACTTAAAATACGCTGTTACC3′ |
| R | 5′GCTTTTTCAGACCAAATAACTTAC3′ | |
| D7S1112i | F (NED) | 5′GAGAATCTAATGAAAGCTGTGG3′ |
| R | 5′TTCAGGGCATCCAAGAAG3′ | |
| D7S0952i | F (NED) | 5′AGATATTTGGCTAAACATGGTC3′ |
| R | 5′TCTTCAGAGATACAGAAGCAATAG3′ | |
| D7S550 | F (FAM) | 5′TCTCATCTGTGAATGCACTATC3′ |
| R | 5′GCAGTTGGGTTATTTCAAGTC3′ | |
| D7S1272i | F (PET) | 5′AATGTCCTGGAGGCTGAG3′ |
| R | 5′AAAGACTTGGTGAGACCTTCTC3′ | |
| D7S2465 | F (PET) | 5′ACCTGGGCAACAGAGTGAG3′ |
| R | 5′CTTCAAAGAGTTTATGCTTATGTGG3′ | |
| D7S1520i | F (PET) | 5′GCTGTTAGCATCTGGTTAATTTAC3′ |
| R | 5′AAACTGAAGTCTGCCATCTATTAG3′ | |
| D7S1108i | F (FAM) | 5′ACTTACTTATCCTACTGATCCGTG3′ |
| R | 5′TGAACCATAAATTACCTCCATTC3′ | |
| D7S1191i | F (VIC) | 5′CACTCTATTTGCATGGTGAAC3′ |
| R | 5′TCCAGTAGAGGGAGCTCAG3′ | |
| D7S0968i | F (NED) | 5′CACATCCTTTATACCTACATTCAG3′ |
| R | 5′TAATTTATCTAGAAGGTCAGCAAA3′ | |
| D7S2423 | F (NED) | 5′CTTCAGACCTTCAGTTGATGAT3′ |
| R | 5′GCTCTCAGACACATTTTCCA3′ | |
| D7S1159i | F (VIC) | 5′CTTGGAGTCAAAGAGGCC3′ |
| R | 5′CTTTCCTGACTCCTTGATTAGAG3′ |
Note: aDye label.
Frequencies of 20 microsatellite markers in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients and healthy participants
| D7S0954i | 9 | 310 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.31 | ||
| D7S0947i | 7 | 151 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 0.64 | ||
| D7S798 | 8 | 211 | 7.8 | 4.0 | 0.08 | ||
| D7S1829 | 13 | 391 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.31 | ||
| D7S2462 | 15 | 132 | 14.5 | 26.2 | 0.0013 | 0.019 | 0.48 |
| D7S0585i | 9 | 324 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 0.46 | ||
| D7S2546 | 8 | 239 | 13.8 | 6.4 | 0.0096 | 0.077 | 2.33 |
| D7S2447 | 4 | 175 | 53.5 | 52.5 | 0.82 | ||
| Z67544 | 6 | 151 | 6.4 | 1.5 | 0.0091 | 0.055 | 3.99 |
| D7S1112i | 6 | 121 | 44.7 | 42.1 | 0.57 | ||
| D7S0952i | 3 | 450 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.21 | ||
| D7S550 | 13 | 192 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.21 | ||
| D7S1272i | 6 | 156 | 20.2 | 13.4 | 0.0499 | 0.30 | 1.64 |
| D7S2465 | 14 | 175 | 22.7 | 32.2 | 0.020 | 0.28 | 0.62 |
| D7S1520i | 8 | 300 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 0.58 | ||
| D7S1108i | 14 | 188 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.040 | 0.56 | 6.63 |
| D7S1191i | 6 | 181 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.77 | ||
| D7S0968i | 6 | 357 | 50.0 | 44.6 | 0.24 | ||
| D7S2423 | 5 | 250 | 19.9 | 29.2 | 0.017 | 0.086 | 0.60 |
| D7S1159i | 8 | 115 | 13.8 | 9.4 | 0.14 | ||
Note: aAlleles found to exhibit the most difference in frequencies between patients and healthy participants for each marker are shown. Each allele was designated by the size of its amplification.