Literature DB >> 19668188

The Ink4/Arf locus is a barrier for iPS cell reprogramming.

Han Li1, Manuel Collado, Aranzazu Villasante, Katerina Strati, Sagrario Ortega, Marta Cañamero, Maria A Blasco, Manuel Serrano.   

Abstract

The mechanisms involved in the reprogramming of differentiated cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by the three transcription factors Oct4 (also known as Pou5f1), Klf4 and Sox2 remain poorly understood. The Ink4/Arf locus comprises the Cdkn2a-Cdkn2b genes encoding three potent tumour suppressors, namely p16(Ink4a), p19(Arf) and p15(Ink4b), which are basally expressed in differentiated cells and upregulated by aberrant mitogenic signals. Here we show that the locus is completely silenced in iPS cells, as well as in embryonic stem (ES) cells, acquiring the epigenetic marks of a bivalent chromatin domain, and retaining the ability to be reactivated after differentiation. Cell culture conditions during reprogramming enhance the expression of the Ink4/Arf locus, further highlighting the importance of silencing the locus to allow proliferation and reprogramming. Indeed, the three factors together repress the Ink4/Arf locus soon after their expression and concomitant with the appearance of the first molecular markers of 'stemness'. This downregulation also occurs in cells carrying the oncoprotein large-T, which functionally inactivates the pathways regulated by the Ink4/Arf locus, thus indicating that the silencing of the locus is intrinsic to reprogramming and not the result of a selective process. Genetic inhibition of the Ink4/Arf locus has a profound positive effect on the efficiency of iPS cell generation, increasing both the kinetics of reprogramming and the number of emerging iPS cell colonies. In murine cells, Arf, rather than Ink4a, is the main barrier to reprogramming by activation of p53 (encoded by Trp53) and p21 (encoded by Cdkn1a); whereas, in human fibroblasts, INK4a is more important than ARF. Furthermore, organismal ageing upregulates the Ink4/Arf locus and, accordingly, reprogramming is less efficient in cells from old organisms, but this defect can be rescued by inhibiting the locus with a short hairpin RNA. All together, we conclude that the silencing of Ink4/Arf locus is rate-limiting for reprogramming, and its transient inhibition may significantly improve the generation of iPS cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19668188      PMCID: PMC3578184          DOI: 10.1038/nature08290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  31 in total

Review 1.  Divorcing ARF and p53: an unsettled case.

Authors:  Charles J Sherr
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Cellular senescence in cancer and aging.

Authors:  Manuel Collado; Maria A Blasco; Manuel Serrano
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of drug selection.

Authors:  Robert Blelloch; Monica Venere; Jonathan Yen; Miguel Ramalho-Santos
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  A stem cell-like chromatin pattern may predispose tumor suppressor genes to DNA hypermethylation and heritable silencing.

Authors:  Joyce E Ohm; Kelly M McGarvey; Xiaobing Yu; Linzhao Cheng; Kornel E Schuebel; Leslie Cope; Helai P Mohammad; Wei Chen; Vincent C Daniel; Wayne Yu; David M Berman; Thomas Jenuwein; Kevin Pruitt; Saul J Sharkis; D Neil Watkins; James G Herman; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Deletion of Ku70, Ku80, or both causes early aging without substantially increased cancer.

Authors:  Han Li; Hannes Vogel; Valerie B Holcomb; Yansong Gu; Paul Hasty
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Cellular senescence: hot or what?

Authors:  Gerard I Evan; Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors.

Authors:  In-Hyun Park; Rui Zhao; Jason A West; Akiko Yabuuchi; Hongguang Huo; Tan A Ince; Paul H Lerou; M William Lensch; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Takahashi; Koji Tanabe; Mari Ohnuki; Megumi Narita; Tomoko Ichisaka; Kiichiro Tomoda; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells.

Authors:  Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Manching Ku; David B Jaffe; Biju Issac; Erez Lieberman; Georgia Giannoukos; Pablo Alvarez; William Brockman; Tae-Kyung Kim; Richard P Koche; William Lee; Eric Mendenhall; Aisling O'Donovan; Aviva Presser; Carsten Russ; Xiaohui Xie; Alexander Meissner; Marius Wernig; Rudolf Jaenisch; Chad Nusbaum; Eric S Lander; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines.

Authors:  Véronique Azuara; Pascale Perry; Stephan Sauer; Mikhail Spivakov; Helle F Jørgensen; Rosalind M John; Mina Gouti; Miguel Casanova; Gary Warnes; Matthias Merkenschlager; Amanda G Fisher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  468 in total

1.  Evidence for premature aging due to oxidative stress in iPSCs from Cockayne syndrome.

Authors:  Luciana Nogueira de Sousa Andrade; Jason L Nathanson; Gene W Yeo; Carlos Frederico Martins Menck; Alysson Renato Muotri
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  From microRNAs to targets: pathway discovery in cell fate transitions.

Authors:  Deepa Subramanyam; Robert Blelloch
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 3.  Bypassing cellular senescence by genetic screening tools.

Authors:  Mar Vergel; Amancio Carnero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches.

Authors:  Shinya Yamanaka; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  EMT, cancer stem cells and drug resistance: an emerging axis of evil in the war on cancer.

Authors:  A Singh; J Settleman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Rational design of cyclic peptide modulators of the transcriptional coactivator CBP: a new class of p53 inhibitors.

Authors:  Guillermo Gerona-Navarro; Shiraz Mujtaba; Antonio Frasca; Jigneshkumar Patel; Lei Zeng; Alexander N Plotnikov; Roman Osman; Ming-Ming Zhou
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  c-Raf, but not B-Raf, is essential for development of K-Ras oncogene-driven non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Rafael B Blasco; Sarah Francoz; David Santamaría; Marta Cañamero; Pierre Dubus; Jean Charron; Manuela Baccarini; Mariano Barbacid
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 8.  Learning the molecular mechanisms of the reprogramming factors: let's start from microRNAs.

Authors:  Chao-Shun Yang; Tariq M Rana
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2012-10-05

Review 9.  Mechanisms underlying the formation of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Federico González; Danwei Huangfu
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.814

Review 10.  Translating induced pluripotent stem cells from bench to bedside: application to retinal diseases.

Authors:  Alona O Cramer; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.