BACKGROUND: Intracellular ATP (iATP) production in CD4(+)-T cells has been proposed as a biomarker for routine personalized monitoring in transplant recipients. The aim of our study was to measure this biomarker in adult renal and liver transplant recipients receiving moderate immunosuppressive treatment (IST) during the maintenance period and to evaluate whether this biomarker can effectively predict clinical status (stability, rejection, or infection) and drug effect. METHODS: iATP concentration and trough blood levels of IST were evaluated in 84 adult transplant recipients (50 renal and 34 liver) during the maintenance period. One hundred and fifty healthy donors were also recruited as a control group. In addition, 22 of 34 liver transplant recipients were included in a clinical study in which IST was withdrawn gradually until total elimination. RESULTS: Most of the patients evaluated had iATP levels in the moderate immune response zone during a posttransplantation maintenance period with no relevant clinical events. iATP levels were significantly lower in transplant patients with infection (n=3) than in those free of infection. In the IST withdrawal study, 10 of 22 liver transplant recipients have achieved complete withdrawal and 12 receive 50% of IST. So far, there have been eight rejections once IST began to be withdrawn. None of these patients had iATP in the strong immune response zone (risk of rejection). CONCLUSIONS: iATP seems to be more effective in identifying overimmunosuppressed patients with a high risk of adverse events (IST-safety) than in identifying those with a high risk of rejection (IST-efficacy) and should be used in combination with other biomarkers of immunosuppressive effect to improve the efficacy of IST.
BACKGROUND: Intracellular ATP (iATP) production in CD4(+)-T cells has been proposed as a biomarker for routine personalized monitoring in transplant recipients. The aim of our study was to measure this biomarker in adult renal and liver transplant recipients receiving moderate immunosuppressive treatment (IST) during the maintenance period and to evaluate whether this biomarker can effectively predict clinical status (stability, rejection, or infection) and drug effect. METHODS:iATP concentration and trough blood levels of IST were evaluated in 84 adult transplant recipients (50 renal and 34 liver) during the maintenance period. One hundred and fifty healthy donors were also recruited as a control group. In addition, 22 of 34 liver transplant recipients were included in a clinical study in which IST was withdrawn gradually until total elimination. RESULTS: Most of the patients evaluated had iATP levels in the moderate immune response zone during a posttransplantation maintenance period with no relevant clinical events. iATP levels were significantly lower in transplant patients with infection (n=3) than in those free of infection. In the IST withdrawal study, 10 of 22 liver transplant recipients have achieved complete withdrawal and 12 receive 50% of IST. So far, there have been eight rejections once IST began to be withdrawn. None of these patients had iATP in the strong immune response zone (risk of rejection). CONCLUSIONS:iATP seems to be more effective in identifying overimmunosuppressed patients with a high risk of adverse events (IST-safety) than in identifying those with a high risk of rejection (IST-efficacy) and should be used in combination with other biomarkers of immunosuppressive effect to improve the efficacy of IST.
Authors: Ivan Margeta; Ivana Mareković; Ana Pešut; Marina Zelenika; Marija Dorotić; Ivana Mrnjec; Mladen Knotek Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 1.817