Literature DB >> 19666127

Common and segregated neural pathways for the processing of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude: an fMRI study.

Ian D Holloway1, Gavin R Price, Daniel Ansari.   

Abstract

Numbers are everywhere in modern life. Looking out a window, one might see both symbolic numbers, like the numerals on a thermometer, and nonsymbolic quantities, such as the number of chickadees at a bird feeder. Although differences between symbolic and nonsymbolic numbers appear very salient, most research on numerical cognition has focused on similarities rather than differences between numerical stimulus formats. Thus, little is known about differences in the processing of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitudes. A recent computational model proposed that symbolic and nonsymbolic quantities undergo distinct encoding processes which then converge on a common neural representation of numerical magnitude (Verguts, T., Fias, W., 2004. Representation of number in animals and humans: a neural model. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (9), 1493-1504.). Moreover, this model predicted that discrete brain regions underlie these encoding processes. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, the present study tested the predictions of this model by examining the functional neuroanatomy of symbolic and nonsymbolic number processing. Nineteen adults compared the relative numerical magnitude of symbolic and nonsymbolic stimuli. An initial conjunction analysis revealed the right inferior parietal lobule to be significantly active in both symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical comparison. A contrast of the activation associated with symbolic and nonsymbolic stimuli revealed that both the left angular and superior temporal gyri were more activated for symbolic compared to nonsymbolic numerical magnitude judgments. The reverse comparison (nonsymbolic>symbolic) revealed several regions including the right posterior superior parietal lobe. These results reveal both format-general and format-specific processing of numerical stimuli in the brain. The potential roles of these regions in symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical processing are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19666127     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  43 in total

1.  The function of the left angular gyrus in mental arithmetic: evidence from the associative confusion effect.

Authors:  Roland H Grabner; Daniel Ansari; Karl Koschutnig; Gernot Reishofer; Franz Ebner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Parietal functional connectivity in numerical cognition.

Authors:  Joonkoo Park; Denise C Park; Thad A Polk
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  How do individual differences in children's domain specific and domain general abilities relate to brain activity within the intraparietal sulcus during arithmetic? An fMRI study.

Authors:  Anna A Matejko; Daniel Ansari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Does the approximate number system serve as a foundation for symbolic mathematics?

Authors:  Emily Szkudlarek; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2017-01-31

5.  Decoding the representation of numerical values from brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Saudamini Roy Damarla; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Neural Tuning to Numerosity Relates to Perceptual Tuning in 3-6-Year-Old Children.

Authors:  Alyssa J Kersey; Jessica F Cantlon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Weak task-related modulation and stimulus representations during arithmetic problem solving in children with developmental dyscalculia.

Authors:  Sarit Ashkenazi; Miriam Rosenberg-Lee; Caitlin Tenison; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  Altered neural activity of magnitude estimation processing in adults with the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  So-Yeon Kim; Ryu-ichiro Hashimoto; Flora Tassone; Tony J Simon; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  Using cognitive training studies to unravel the mechanisms by which the approximate number system supports symbolic math ability.

Authors:  Stephanie Bugden; Nicholas K DeWind; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-05-11

10.  Modality-independent representations of small quantities based on brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Saudamini Roy Damarla; Vladimir L Cherkassky; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.