Literature DB >> 19665936

An investigation into the hypoalgesic effects of high- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on experimentally-induced blunt pressure pain in healthy human participants.

Chih-Chung Chen1, Mark I Johnson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive technique used to reduce pain. It is claimed that TENS frequency is a key determinant of outcome. This study compared TENS delivered at 3 pulses per second (pps) and 80 pps on blunt pressure pain in human participants when TENS intensity was standardized at a strong nonpainful level. Thirty-two pain-free participants completed an experiment in which they received TENS at 3 pps and 80 pps in a crossover fashion. An algometer was used to measure pain threshold for each frequency before and during 20 minutes of TENS. A statistically significant elevation in pain threshold relative to baseline was found for 80 pps when compared to 3 pps after 10 and 20 minutes of TENS (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). After 20 minutes of TENS, 30 of 32 participants had exceeded a 10N elevation in threshold relative to baseline during 80 pps compared to 19 participants during 3 pps (odds ratio 10.3 (CI, 2.28, 44.78), P = .002). We suggest that the higher rates of impulse generation by TENS at 80 pps resulted in a stronger afferent input to the central nervous system, resulting in stronger segmental inhibition of nociceptive transmission of second-order neurones, in line with the gate control theory of pain. In conclusion, strong nonpainful TENS at 80 pps was superior to 3 pps at increasing pressure-pain threshold in healthy volunteers. We recommend a follow-up study using pain patients. PERSPECTIVE: This study provides evidence that high frequency TENS at 80 pulses per second increases pain threshold to pressure algometry in healthy participants over and above that seen with low frequency TENS at 3 pulses per second when a strong nonpainful TENS sensation is experienced within the site of experimental pain. Copyright 2010 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19665936     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  15 in total

1.  The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain during venous cannulation.

Authors:  Saeyoung Kim; Kibum Park; Byungdoo Son; Younghoon Jeon
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Tracey E Howe; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-15

3.  Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, pain sensitivity, and function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carol Grace T Vance; Barbara A Rakel; Nicole P Blodgett; Josimari Melo DeSantana; Annunziato Amendola; Miriam Bridget Zimmerman; Deirdre M Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-30

4.  Medial tibial pain pressure threshold algometry in runners.

Authors:  Osama Aweid; Rosa Gallie; Dylan Morrissey; Tom Crisp; Nicola Maffulli; Peter Malliaras; Nat Padhiar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The effect of physical therapy and rehabilitation modalities on sleep quality in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis: A single-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled study.

Authors:  Elif Umay Altaş; Ümit Demirdal
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-03-03

6.  Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xia Bi; Hong Lv; Bin-Lin Chen; Xin Li; Xue-Qiang Wang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-01-09

7.  Influence of different frequencies of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the threshold and pain intensity in young subjects.

Authors:  Adriana de Oliveira Gomes; Ana Caroline Silvestre; Cristina Ferreira da Silva; Mariany Ribeiro Gomes; Maria Lúcia Bonfleur; Gladson Ricardo Flor Bertolini
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-09

8.  Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness.

Authors:  Carol Gt Vance; Barbara A Rakel; Dana L Dailey; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  The combined effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and stretching on muscle hardness and pressure pain threshold.

Authors:  Hiroshi Karasuno; Hisayoshi Ogihara; Katsuyuki Morishita; Yuka Yokoi; Takayuki Fujiwara; Yoshiro Ogoma; Koji Abe
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-04-28

10.  The antalgic effects of non-invasive physical modalities on central post-stroke pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chih-Chung Chen; Yu-Fen Chuang; Andrew Chih-Wei Huang; Chih-Kuang Chen; Ya-Ju Chang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.