Rafael Juan Blanes1. 1. Private Practice, Clinica Pronova, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. rafael.blanes@clinicapronova.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of biological and technical complications with respect to the crown-implant (C/I) ratio of implant-supported reconstructions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic (MEDLINE) and hand searches were conducted for longitudinal prospective studies with a follow-up period of at least 4 years. One reviewer performed screening and data abstraction. The following complications were evaluated: implant survival, peri-implant crestal bone loss, implant fracture, and technical complications related to implant components and suprastructure. RESULTS: The search provided 41 articles and abstracts, seven of which were selected for full-text analysis. Only two articles were finally included. A qualitative data analysis revealed that the survival rate of implant-supported reconstructions with a C/I ratio of more than 2 was 94.1%. In addition, peri-implant crestal bone loss seemed not to be influenced by the C/I ratio of the implant rehabilitation, except in one study, which noted greater crestal bone loss with lower (<1) compared with higher (>2) C/I ratios. Technical complications related to implant components and suprastructure according to different C/I ratios were not found in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the diversity among studies with respect to data collection and study design, the current literature shows that the C/I ratios of implant-supported reconstructions do not influence peri-implant crestal bone loss.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of biological and technical complications with respect to the crown-implant (C/I) ratio of implant-supported reconstructions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic (MEDLINE) and hand searches were conducted for longitudinal prospective studies with a follow-up period of at least 4 years. One reviewer performed screening and data abstraction. The following complications were evaluated: implant survival, peri-implant crestal bone loss, implant fracture, and technical complications related to implant components and suprastructure. RESULTS: The search provided 41 articles and abstracts, seven of which were selected for full-text analysis. Only two articles were finally included. A qualitative data analysis revealed that the survival rate of implant-supported reconstructions with a C/I ratio of more than 2 was 94.1%. In addition, peri-implant crestal bone loss seemed not to be influenced by the C/I ratio of the implant rehabilitation, except in one study, which noted greater crestal bone loss with lower (<1) compared with higher (>2) C/I ratios. Technical complications related to implant components and suprastructure according to different C/I ratios were not found in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the diversity among studies with respect to data collection and study design, the current literature shows that the C/I ratios of implant-supported reconstructions do not influence peri-implant crestal bone loss.
Authors: Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: Juan A V Palacios; Jaime Jiménez Garcia; João M M Caramês; Marc Quirynen; Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Evandro Portela Figueirêdo; Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez; Marcele Jardim Pimentel; Ana Regina Oliveira Moreira; Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo; José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2014-10-08
Authors: Guillermo Pardo-Zamora; Antonio José Ortiz-Ruíz; Fabio Camacho-Alonso; José Francisco Martínez-Marco; Juan Manuel Molina-González; Núria Piqué-Clusella; Ascensión Vicente-Hernández Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: J-L Sierra-Sánchez; F García-Sala-Bonmatí; A Martínez-González; C García-Dalmau; J-F Mañes-Ferrer; A Brotons-Oliver Journal: Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Date: 2016-05-01
Authors: Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Konstanty Sławecki; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Marzena Dominiak; Tomasz Gedrange Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.411