Literature DB >> 19661149

Effects of electrical stimulation on isolated rodent gastric smooth muscle cells evaluated via a joint computational simulation and experimental approach.

P Du1, S Li, G O'Grady, L K Cheng, A J Pullan, J D Z Chen.   

Abstract

Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) involves the delivery of electrical impulses to the stomach for therapeutic purposes. New GES protocols are needed that are optimized for improved motility outcomes and energy efficiency. In this study, a biophysically based smooth muscle cell (SMC) model was modified on the basis of experimental data and employed in conjunction with experimental studies to define the effects of a large range of GES protocols on individual SMCs. For the validation studies, rat gastric SMCs were isolated and subjected to patch-clamp analysis during stimulation. Experimental results were in satisfactory agreement with simulation results. The results define the effects of a wide range of GES parameters (pulse width, amplitude, and pulse-train frequency) on isolated SMCs. The minimum pulse width required to invoke a supramechanical threshold response from SMCs (defined at -30 mV) was 65 ms (at 250-pA amplitude). The minimum amplitude required to invoke this threshold was 75 pA (at 1,000-ms pulse width). The amplitude of the invoked response beyond this threshold was proportional to the stimulation amplitude. A high-frequency train of stimuli (40 Hz; 10 ms, 150 pA) could invoke and maintain the SMC plateau phase while requiring 60% less power and accruing approximately 30% less intracellular Ca(2+) concentration during the plateau phase than a comparable single-pulse protocol could in a demonstrated example. Validated computational simulations are an effective strategy for efficiently identifying effective minimum-energy GES protocols, and pulse-train protocols may also help to reduce the power consumption of future GES devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19661149      PMCID: PMC2763803          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00149.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  29 in total

1.  Efficiency and efficacy of multi-channel gastric electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J D Z Chen; X Xu; J Zhang; M Abo; X Lin; R W McCallum; B Ross
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Efficacy of electrical stimulation at frequencies higher than basal rate in canine stomach.

Authors:  B O Familoni; T L Abell; D Nemoto; G Voeller; B Johnson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches.

Authors:  O P Hamill; A Marty; E Neher; B Sakmann; F J Sigworth
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Prostaglandins as possible mediators in the relaxing effect on the gastric smooth muscle by electrical transmural stimulation.

Authors:  V Bettini; R Aragno; E Legrenzi
Journal:  Agressologie       Date:  1984-10

5.  Gastric pacing improves emptying and symptoms in patients with gastroparesis.

Authors:  R W McCallum; J D Chen; Z Lin; B D Schirmer; R D Williams; R A Ross
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Role of G-proteins in muscarinic receptor inward and outward currents in rabbit jejunal smooth muscle.

Authors:  S Komori; T B Bolton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  An anatomical model of the gastric system for producing bioelectric and biomagnetic fields.

Authors:  M L Buist; L K Cheng; R Yassi; L A Bradshaw; W O Richards; A J Pullan
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 8.  Anatomically realistic multiscale models of normal and abnormal gastrointestinal electrical activity.

Authors:  Leo K Cheng; Rie Komuro; Travis M Austin; Martin L Buist; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Treatment of gastroparesis with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Zhiyue Lin; Jameson Forster; Irene Sarosiek; Richard W McCallum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  A tissue framework for simulating the effects of gastric electrical stimulation and in vivo validation.

Authors:  Peng Du; Greg O'Grady; John A Windsor; Leo K Cheng; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Multiscale modeling of gastrointestinal electrophysiology and experimental validation.

Authors:  Peng Du; Greg O'Grady; John B Davidson; Leo K Cheng; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Mapping and modeling gastrointestinal bioelectricity: from engineering bench to bedside.

Authors:  L K Cheng; P Du; G O'Grady
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-09

3.  High-resolution entrainment mapping of gastric pacing: a new analytical tool.

Authors:  Gregory O'Grady; Peng Du; Wim J E P Lammers; John U Egbuji; Pulasthi Mithraratne; Jiande D Z Chen; Leo K Cheng; John A Windsor; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Tissue-specific mathematical models of slow wave entrainment in wild-type and 5-HT(2B) knockout mice with altered interstitial cells of Cajal networks.

Authors:  Peng Du; Greg O'Grady; Simon J Gibbons; Rita Yassi; Rachel Lees-Green; Gianrico Farrugia; Leo K Cheng; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Nonparametric Model of Smooth Muscle Force Production During Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Marc Cole; Steffen Eikenberry; Takahide Kato; Roman A Sandler; Stanley M Yamashiro; Vasilis Z Marmarelis
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  Pulse Width-Dependent Effects of Intestinal Electrical Stimulation for Obesity: Role of Gastrointestinal Motility and Hormones.

Authors:  Shiying Li; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Food intake and body weight responses to intermittent vs. continuous gastric electrical stimulation in diet-induced obese rats.

Authors:  Shiying Li; Roland Maude-Griffin; Yan Sun; Warren Starkebaum; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  A tissue framework for simulating the effects of gastric electrical stimulation and in vivo validation.

Authors:  Peng Du; Greg O'Grady; John A Windsor; Leo K Cheng; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 9.  The virtual intestine: in silico modeling of small intestinal electrophysiology and motility and the applications.

Authors:  Peng Du; Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Timothy R Angeli; Leo K Cheng; Gregory O'Grady
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2015-11-12

10.  Acute Slow Wave Responses to High-Frequency Gastric Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Gastroparesis Defined by High-Resolution Mapping.

Authors:  Timothy R Angeli; Peng Du; David Midgley; Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Shameer Sathar; Christopher Lahr; Thomas L Abell; Leo K Cheng; Gregory O'Grady
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.