BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that a shift toward 2-hydroxyestrone from 16alpha-hydroxyestrone metabolic pathway may be inversely associated with breast cancer risk because 2-hydroxyestrone is thought to be less genotoxic and estrogenic than 16alpha-hydroxyestrone. METHODS: We examined the associations of invasive breast cancer risk with circulating 2-hydroxyestrone, 16alpha-hydroxyestrone, and the 2-hydroxyestrone:16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio in a case-control study on premenopausal women nested within a prospective cohort the New York University Women's Health Study. The serum levels of 2-hydroxyestrone and 16alpha-hydroxyestrone were measured in 377 incident premenopausal breast cancer cases and 377 premenopausal controls, who were matched on age at enrollment, number and dates of blood donations, and day and phase of menstrual cycle. RESULTS: Overall, no significant associations were observed between breast cancer risk and serum levels of 2-hydroxyestrone, 16alpha-hydroxyestrone, or their ratio. The 2-hydroxyestrone:16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio was positively associated with risk for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in the analyses controlling for matching factors. However, the association was attenuated and not significant after adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio for the highest versus the lowest quartile, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.88-5.27; P(trend) = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study do not support the hypothesis that a metabolic shift from 16alpha-hydroxyestrone toward 2-hydroxyestrone in premenopausal women is associated with reduced risk for breast cancer. The association between the 2-hydroxy:16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer needs to be explored in future studies.
BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that a shift toward 2-hydroxyestrone from 16alpha-hydroxyestrone metabolic pathway may be inversely associated with breast cancer risk because 2-hydroxyestrone is thought to be less genotoxic and estrogenic than 16alpha-hydroxyestrone. METHODS: We examined the associations of invasive breast cancer risk with circulating 2-hydroxyestrone, 16alpha-hydroxyestrone, and the 2-hydroxyestrone:16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio in a case-control study on premenopausal women nested within a prospective cohort the New York University Women's Health Study. The serum levels of 2-hydroxyestrone and 16alpha-hydroxyestrone were measured in 377 incident premenopausal breast cancer cases and 377 premenopausal controls, who were matched on age at enrollment, number and dates of blood donations, and day and phase of menstrual cycle. RESULTS: Overall, no significant associations were observed between breast cancer risk and serum levels of 2-hydroxyestrone, 16alpha-hydroxyestrone, or their ratio. The 2-hydroxyestrone:16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio was positively associated with risk for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in the analyses controlling for matching factors. However, the association was attenuated and not significant after adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio for the highest versus the lowest quartile, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.88-5.27; P(trend) = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study do not support the hypothesis that a metabolic shift from 16alpha-hydroxyestrone toward 2-hydroxyestrone in premenopausal women is associated with reduced risk for breast cancer. The association between the 2-hydroxy:16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer needs to be explored in future studies.
Authors: P Muti; H L Bradlow; A Micheli; V Krogh; J L Freudenheim; H J Schünemann; M Stanulla; J Yang; D W Sepkovic; M Trevisan; F Berrino Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: R T Falk; S C Rossi; T R Fears; D W Sepkovic; A Migella; H Adlercreutz; J Donaldson; H L Bradlow; R G Ziegler Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Shelley A Gestl; Mitchell D Green; Debra A Shearer; Elizabeth Frauenhoffer; Thomas R Tephly; Judith Weisz Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: H Adlercreutz; T Fotsis; K Höckerstedt; E Hämäläinen; C Bannwart; S Bloigu; A Valtonen; A Ollus Journal: J Steroid Biochem Date: 1989 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Donna Spiegelman; Xia Xu; Larry K Keefer; Timothy D Veenstra; Robert L Barbieri; Walter C Willett; Susan E Hankinson; Regina G Ziegler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Alma J Smith; William R Phipps; William Thomas; Kathryn H Schmitz; Mindy S Kurzer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Alan A Arslan; Karen L Koenig; Per Lenner; Yelena Afanasyeva; Roy E Shore; Yu Chen; Eva Lundin; Paolo Toniolo; Göran Hallmans; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rachel H Mackey; Theresa J Fanelli; Francesmary Modugno; Jane A Cauley; Kathleen M McTigue; Maria Mori Brooks; Rowan T Chlebowski; JoAnn E Manson; Thomas L Klug; Kevin E Kip; J David Curb; Lewis H Kuller Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 4.254