Literature DB >> 19657861

Comparison of waist circumference percentiles versus body mass index percentiles for diagnosis of obesity in a large cohort of children.

John J Reilly1, Ahmad R Dorosty, Narges Miri Ghomizadeh, Andrea Sherriff, Jonathan C Wells, Andrew R Ness.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Waist circumference may offer improved diagnosis of obesity in youth compared with body mass index (BMI), but empirical evidence is limited.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of BMI percentile using UK reference data and waist circumference percentile using UK reference data to diagnose high fat mass in English children. DESIGN AND METHODS: In 7,722 9-10-year-olds (3,809 boys, 3,913 girls) sensitivity and specificity were calculated and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses undertaken to determine the diagnostic accuracy of BMI and waist circumference z-scores to define high fat mass measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). High fat mass was defined as being in the top decile of fatness for each sex (359 boys and 367 girls).
RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve was slightly higher for BMI percentile (0.92 in boys, 95% CI: 0.91 -0.93; 0.94 in girls, 95% CI: 0.93-0.95) than waist circumference percentile (0.89 in boys, 95% CI: 0.86-0.91; 0.81 in girls, 95% CI: 0.73-0.90). Specificity of BMI percentile was slightly but significantly higher than that of waist circumference percentile for both sexes (p<0.05 in each case).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that waist circumference percentile has no advantage over BMI percentile for the diagnosis of high fat mass in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19657861     DOI: 10.3109/17477160903159440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Obes        ISSN: 1747-7166


  5 in total

Review 1.  Diet, growth, and obesity development throughout childhood in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.

Authors:  Pauline M Emmett; Louise R Jones
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  BMI percentiles for the identification of abdominal obesity and metabolic risk in children and adolescents: evidence in support of the CDC 95th percentile.

Authors:  D M Harrington; A E Staiano; S T Broyles; A K Gupta; P T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Adiposity assessments: agreement between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometric measures in U.S. children.

Authors:  Nguyen T Tuan; Youfa Wang
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 4.  [Waist circumference, waist/height ratio, and neck circumference as parameters of central obesity assessment in children].

Authors:  Elma Izze da Silva Magalhães; Luciana Ferreira da Rocha Sant'Ana; Silvia Eloiza Priore; Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2014-10-03

5.  Cardiometabolic risk assessments by body mass index z-score or waist-to-height ratio in a multiethnic sample of sixth-graders.

Authors:  Henry S Kahn; Laure El ghormli; Russell Jago; Gary D Foster; Robert G McMurray; John B Buse; Diane D Stadler; Roberto P Treviño; Tom Baranowski
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2014-07-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.