BACKGROUND: Diffuse pontine glioma is a pediatric brain tumor with a median survival time of 1 year and few long-term survivors. Conventional MRI has not been shown to predict overall survival. With this dismal prognosis, clinical improvement after radiation therapy might be a more relevant issue. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether initial imaging would predict clinical response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of children with diffuse pontine glioma treated at The Children's Hospital, Denver, and the University of Colorado-Denver from 1995 to 2008. The 30 children were divided into two groups based on acute clinical response to radiation therapy. Quantitative measurements on presenting MRIs were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Seven of 30 children did not respond to radiation therapy. There were no statistically significant differences in initial imaging characteristics between responders and non-responders. Necrosis and enhancement were more common in responders. Tumor surrounding the basilar artery, compression of the 4th ventricle and extension to the cerebellum were more common in non-responders. CONCLUSION: Conventional MRI at presentation does not predict clinical response in children with diffuse pontine glioma. Additional studies with larger numbers of patients and other imaging modalities are needed.
BACKGROUND: Diffuse pontine glioma is a pediatric brain tumor with a median survival time of 1 year and few long-term survivors. Conventional MRI has not been shown to predict overall survival. With this dismal prognosis, clinical improvement after radiation therapy might be a more relevant issue. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether initial imaging would predict clinical response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of children with diffuse pontine glioma treated at The Children's Hospital, Denver, and the University of Colorado-Denver from 1995 to 2008. The 30 children were divided into two groups based on acute clinical response to radiation therapy. Quantitative measurements on presenting MRIs were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Seven of 30 children did not respond to radiation therapy. There were no statistically significant differences in initial imaging characteristics between responders and non-responders. Necrosis and enhancement were more common in responders. Tumor surrounding the basilar artery, compression of the 4th ventricle and extension to the cerebellum were more common in non-responders. CONCLUSION: Conventional MRI at presentation does not predict clinical response in children with diffuse pontine glioma. Additional studies with larger numbers of patients and other imaging modalities are needed.
Authors: R R Smith; R A Zimmerman; R J Packer; D B Hackney; L T Bilaniuk; L N Sutton; H I Goldberg; R I Grossman; L Schut Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 1990 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: David N Korones; Paul G Fisher; Cynthia Kretschmar; Tianni Zhou; Zhengjia Chen; James Kepner; Carolyn Freeman Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Anne Laprie; Andrea Pirzkall; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Soonmee Cha; Anuradha Banerjee; Terry P Le; Ying Lu; Sarah Nelson; Tracy R McKnight Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Geert O R J Janssens; Corrie E M Gidding; Erik J Van Lindert; Foppe R Oldenburger; Corrie E Erasmus; Antoinette Y N Schouten-Meeteren; Johannes H A M Kaanders Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C R Freeman; J P Krischer; R A Sanford; M E Cohen; P C Burger; R del Carpio; E C Halperin; L Munoz; H S Friedman; L E Kun Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1993-09-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C S Bruggers; H S Friedman; G N Fuller; R D Tien; L B Marks; E C Halperin; B Hockenberger; W J Oakes; J M Hoffman Journal: Med Pediatr Oncol Date: 1993
Authors: R J Packer; J M Boyett; R A Zimmerman; L B Rorke; A M Kaplan; A L Albright; M T Selch; J L Finlay; G D Hammond; W M Wara Journal: Cancer Date: 1993-08-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Susanne Kossatz; Brandon Carney; Melanie Schweitzer; Giuseppe Carlucci; Vesselin Z Miloushev; Uday B Maachani; Prajwal Rajappa; Kayvan R Keshari; David Pisapia; Wolfgang A Weber; Mark M Souweidane; Thomas Reiner Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Emilie A Steffen-Smith; David J Venzon; Robyn S Bent; Sean J Hipp; Katherine E Warren Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Emilie A Steffen-Smith; Eva H Baker; David Venzon; Shaefali Shandilya; Robyn S Bent; Katherine E Warren Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Robert M Lober; Yoon-Jae Cho; Yujie Tang; Patrick D Barnes; Michael S Edwards; Hannes Vogel; Paul G Fisher; Michelle Monje; Kristen W Yeom Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 4.130