Literature DB >> 8407392

Final results of a study of escalating doses of hyperfractionated radiotherapy in brain stem tumors in children: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

C R Freeman1, J P Krischer, R A Sanford, M E Cohen, P C Burger, R del Carpio, E C Halperin, L Munoz, H S Friedman, L E Kun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In September 1984, the Pediatric Oncology Group began accrual to a Phase I/II study designed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of sequentially escalated doses of hyperfractionated (twice daily) radiotherapy in children with poor-prognosis brain stem tumors. Pediatric Oncology Group Study #8495 closed in June 1990 with a total of 136 patients on study. We report here the outcome of patients treated at the third and final dose level (75.6 Gy), and compare the results to those obtained at the 66 and 70.2 Gy dose levels. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients eligible for study were those between 3 and 21 years of age with previously untreated tumors arising in the midbrain, pons or medulla. Histological confirmation of diagnosis was not mandatory provided that the clinical and radiological findings were typical for brain stem glioma. Treatment consisted of radiotherapy delivered to local fields. At the third dose level, fraction sizes of 1.26 Gy were given twice daily, with a minimum interfraction interval of 6 hr to a dose of 75.6 Gy in 60 fractions over 6 weeks. Between 5/89 and 6/90, 41 patients were accrued to the study. Two were excluded from analysis leaving 39 evaluable patients, 21 male and 19 female, whose ages ranged from 3 to 15 years (median 7.5 years).
RESULTS: Following treatment, neurological improvement was reported in 30/39 (77%) of the patients. On central review of imaging studies in 29 patients, one patient was found to have had a complete response to radiotherapy, five a partial (> 50% response), and only three had non-responding or progressive disease. The median time to disease progression was 7 months; median survival time was 10 months; survival at 1 year was 39.9% (SE 8.3%) and at 2 years, 7% (SE 4.8%). The pattern of failure was local in all patients; in addition six had evidence of leptomeningeal seeding. Morbidity of treatment included an enhanced skin reaction (21%), otitis media and/or externa (26%), and steroid use > 3 months (62%). Intralesional necrosis was a frequent finding (45%) on imaging studies performed at a median time of 6 weeks post treatment.
CONCLUSION: The results of treatment in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival are not significantly different (at p = .55 and p = .46, respectively) from those obtained at the two previous dose levels. There is no evidence that higher doses of hyperfractionated radiotherapy given as in this study improve the outlook of patients with poor-risk brain stem gliomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8407392     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90228-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  48 in total

1.  Dose-intensive, time-compressed procarbazine, CCNU, vincristine (PCV) with peripheral blood stem cell support and concurrent radiation in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  R I Jakacki; J Siffert; C Jamison; L Velasquez; J C Allen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Radiation associated brainstem injury.

Authors:  Charles Mayo; Ellen Yorke; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Metachronous medulloblastoma and glioblastoma: Implications for clinical and technical aspects of re-irradiation.

Authors:  Vivek Verma; Rajesh R Kulkarni; Abhijeet R Bhirud; Nathan R Bennion; Rodney D McComb; Chi Lin
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-11-21

Review 4.  Pediatric brain tumors: current treatment strategies and future therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Sabine Mueller; Susan Chang
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  Phase II trial of temozolomide in children with recurrent high-grade glioma.

Authors:  A Ruggiero; G Cefalo; M L Garré; M Massimino; C Colosimo; G Attinà; I Lazzareschi; P Maurizi; V Ridola; G Mazzarella; M Caldarelli; C Di Rocco; E Madon; M E Abate; A Clerico; A Sandri; R Riccardi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  School refusal and truancy.

Authors:  I Berg
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Improving care for central nervous system tumours: a mood for change.

Authors:  L S Lashford; D A Walker
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  The potential of theragnostic ¹²⁴I-8H9 convection-enhanced delivery in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Authors:  Neal Luther; Zhiping Zhou; Pat Zanzonico; Nai-Kong Cheung; John Humm; Mark A Edgar; Mark M Souweidane
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Motexafin-gadolinium and involved field radiation therapy for intrinsic pontine glioma of childhood: a children's oncology group phase 2 study.

Authors:  Kristin A Bradley; Tianni Zhou; Rene Y McNall-Knapp; Regina I Jakacki; Adam S Levy; Gilbert Vezina; Ian F Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Outcome and prognostic factors of childhood diffuse brainstem glioma.

Authors:  Semie Hong; Il Han Kim; Kyu Chang Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.