Literature DB >> 19657608

A prospective cohort study on the effectiveness of 3500 IU versus 5000 IU bemiparin in the prophylaxis of postoperative thrombotic events in obese patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Patrick Vavken1, Andreas Lunzer, Josef Georg Grohs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative thromboses are among the most feared complications in orthopedic surgery as they may cause life-threatening conditions in otherwise highly successful procedures such as total joint replacement. Body weight is an important risk factor for thromboses and is used in algorithms to determine dosages in prophylaxis. However, weight patterns among orthopedic populations have changed considerably since the introduction of these algorithms, essentially shifting towards obesity. This study asks whether present-day obese patients would benefit from higher than usual dosages of bemiparin in the prophylaxis of postoperative thrombosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To detect at least a 5% difference in the incidence of clinically symptomatic thrombotic events with sufficient power, 750 patients were enrolled in the study and treated with 3,500 IU or 5,000 IU bemiparin. Differences in rates were modelled in a Poisson regression including as covariates the potential confounders severity of immobilization, sex, exact weight and age.
RESULTS: Overall, 723 patients were followed for a total of 66.8 person-years and analyzed by intention-to-treat. The ratio of incidence rates in the two groups of patients was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.03-2.91), thus there was no evidence for a difference in rates between groups. There was, however, a borderline significant association between incidence rates and body weight. There were no complications resulting from the higher dosages of bemiparin.
CONCLUSION: Both groups of treated patients showed low incidence rates of thromboses and we did not see a significant reduction of incidence rates with higher dosages of bemiparin in this population. However, there was weak evidence that higher dosages might prove beneficial if populations gain weight even further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19657608     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-009-1175-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  17 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of bemiparin compared with enoxaparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  A Navarro-Quilis; E Castellet; E Rocha; J Paz-Jiménez; A Planès
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 2.  [Venous thromboembolism].

Authors:  Maria-Theresa Krauth; Ingrid Pabinger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Management of confounding in controlled orthopaedic trials: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Patrick Vavken; Georg Culen; Ronald Dorotka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Low-molecular-weight heparins.

Authors:  J I Weitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of 3,000 IU aXa of the low molecular weight heparin certoparin with 5,000 IU aXa in prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. German Thrombosis Study Group.

Authors:  J Adolf; H M Fritsche; S Haas; F F Hennig; T Horbach; S Kastl; K Koppenhagen; H C Michaelis; R Rhamanzadeh; W Summa; W Wagner; U Weber; H Wolf
Journal:  Int Angiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  A comparative double-blind, randomised trial of a new second generation LMWH (bemiparin) and UFH in the prevention of post-operative venous thromboembolism. The Bemiparin Assessment group.

Authors:  V V Kakkar; J Howes; V Sharma; Z Kadziola
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  [Austrian Guidelines for Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism].

Authors:  Ingrid Pabinger; Sabine Eichinger; Erich Minar; Herwig Niessner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Prevention of deep vein thrombosis after hip replacement: randomised comparison between unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin.

Authors:  P F Leyvraz; F Bachmann; J Hoek; H R Büller; M Postel; M Samama; M D Vandenbroek
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-09-07

9.  Optimal dosing of bemiparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in surgery for cancer: an audit of practice.

Authors:  J L Balibrea; J Altimiras; I Larruzea; A Gómez-Outes; J Martínez-González; E Rocha
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 10.  Bemiparin: a review of its use in the prevention of venous thromboembolism and treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Therese M Chapman; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Measuring anti-factor xa activity to monitor low-molecular-weight heparin in obesity: a critical review.

Authors:  Gregory Egan; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.