Literature DB >> 10780310

A comparative double-blind, randomised trial of a new second generation LMWH (bemiparin) and UFH in the prevention of post-operative venous thromboembolism. The Bemiparin Assessment group.

V V Kakkar1, J Howes, V Sharma, Z Kadziola.   

Abstract

A randomised, prospective, double-blind trial was performed, to compare the safety and efficacy of a new low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) Bemiparin and standard unfractionated heparin (UFH), for the prophylaxis of postoperative venous thromboembolism. 300 patients scheduled to undergo elective hip arthroplasty were included. The principal outcome measures were the incidence of thromboembolic events and bleeding complications. 149 patients received 3,500 anti-Xa IU of bemiparin plus a placebo injection daily and 149 patients received 5,000 IU of UFH twice a day. The two groups were similar with respect to factors likely to affect the risk of developing post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and risk of bleeding events. During the post-operative period, 34 patients developed VTE complications; 9 (7.2%) in the bemiparin group and 25 (18.7%) in the UFH group. VTE in the two groups was statistically significant (OR of 2.96; 95% CI 1.32-6.62 and p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the frequency of bleeding complications: major bleeding requiring discontinuation of prophylaxis, (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.36-4.05; p = 1.00), the measured median operative blood loss (p = 0.77) or the median postoperative drain loss (p = 0.97), and the number of patients who developed wound haematoma (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.31-2.46; p = 1.00). A comparison of coagulation parameters on the preoperative day with post-operative day 2 +/- 1, day 6 +/- 1 and day of discharge showed a significantly higher AT concentration, anti-factor Xa activity and TFPI levels in the bemiparin group when compared with UFH. This study demonstrates that bemiparin, in a single daily subcutaneous dose of 3,500 anti-Xa IU in high risk patients undergoing hip arthroplasty is more effective than UFH administered twice daily at a dose of 5,000 IU in the prevention of postoperative VTE. Both agents are equally safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10780310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  10 in total

1.  Low-molecular-weight heparins: before or after surgery? New concepts and evidence: Congress report from the Sigma Tau/ROVI Satellite Symposium (Rome, Italy, 13 November 2006).

Authors:  Eduardo Rocha; Davide Imberti; Elio Paschina
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Bemiparin versus unfractionated heparin as bridging therapy in the perioperative management of patients on vitamin K antagonists: the BERTA study.

Authors:  Amparo Santamaría; Arantxa Ugarriza; Carmen Muñoz; Isabel De Diego; Francisca López-Chulia; Carmen Benet; Javier Martínez-González; Natividad Gómez; Elena Pina; Xavier Ortín; Pascual Marco; Franciso Javier Roncalés; Jordi Fontcuberta
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Clinical experience with bemiparin.

Authors:  José Ignacio Abad Rico; Francisco S Lozano Sánchez; Eduardo Rocha
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Bemiparin: pharmacological profile.

Authors:  Carlos F Sánchez-Ferrer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Cost effectiveness of bemiparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin and oral anticoagulants in the acute and long-term treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Antonio Gómez-Outes; Eduardo Rocha; Javier Martínez-González; Vijay V Kakkar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Pharmacoeconomic analysis of bemiparin and enoxaparin as prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in total knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Jesús Honorato; Antonio Gómez-Outes; Antonio Navarro-Quilis; Javier Martínez-González; Eduardo Rocha; André Planès
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Effectiveness and safety of bemiparin versus low-molecular weight heparins in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  R Ferriols-Lisart; F Ferriols-Lisart; V Jiménez-Torres
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2002-06

8.  A prospective cohort study on the effectiveness of 3500 IU versus 5000 IU bemiparin in the prophylaxis of postoperative thrombotic events in obese patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Patrick Vavken; Andreas Lunzer; Josef Georg Grohs
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Utilisation and safety of bemiparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, in medical patients : a prospective, uncontrolled cohort study.

Authors:  Francisco Miras-Parra; Emilia Navascués-Martínez; Antonio Gómez-Outes; Javier Martínez-González; Eduardo Rocha
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 10.  Bemiparin: a review of its use in the prevention of venous thromboembolism and treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Therese M Chapman; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.